Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWSIX vs SSGSX
HWSIX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HWSIX vs SSGSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value I
Price$75.75
Change+$0.41 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets779.04M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.37
Change+$0.32 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.73B
HWSIX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWSIX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWSIX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.73B vs. HWSIX (779M). HWSIX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HWSIX (1.05) vs SSGSX (0.51). HWSIX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HWSIX (40 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than HWSIX (1.05). HWSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWSIX: SSGSX (2500) vs HWSIX (250000). HWSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.90 vs. SSGSX (-8.77). HWSIX return over 5 years is better than : 96.64 vs. SSGSX (23.49).
| HWSIX | SSGSX | HWSIX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.26 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.26 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.869 | -2.283 | -82% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 2500 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 779M | 5.73B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.51 | 207% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.90 | -8.77 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.27 | -2.14 | -434% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.64 | 23.49 | 411% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.01 | 18.39 | 196% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement