Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWSIX vs SSGSX
HWSIX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HWSIX vs SSGSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value I
Price$79.50
Change+$0.57 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets667.73M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.05
Change+$0.29 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.04B
HWSIX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWSIX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWSIX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.04B vs. HWSIX (668M). HWSIX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HWSIX (1.01) vs SSGSX (0.61). HWSIX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HWSIX (40 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than HWSIX (1.06). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. HWSIX (41.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWSIX: SSGSX (2500) vs HWSIX (250000). HWSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.50 vs. SSGSX (1.49). HWSIX return over 5 years is better than : 39.55 vs. SSGSX (-3.16).
| HWSIX | SSGSX | HWSIX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.23 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.23 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.269 | 5.281 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 2500 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 668M | 5.04B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 0.61 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.50 | 1.49 | 435% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.68 | -1.36 | -1,078% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.55 | -3.16 | -1,251% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.10 | 50.55 | 182% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers