Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWSIX vs SSGSX
HWSIX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HWSIX vs SSGSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value I
Price$75.22
Change+$0.05 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets769.78M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.78
Change+$0.17 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.51B
HWSIX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWSIX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWSIX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.51B vs. HWSIX (770M). HWSIX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HWSIX (1.02) vs SSGSX (0.50). HWSIX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HWSIX (40 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than HWSIX (1.05). HWSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWSIX: SSGSX (2500) vs HWSIX (250000). HWSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.64 vs. SSGSX (-5.70). HWSIX return over 5 years is better than : 86.01 vs. SSGSX (19.32).
| HWSIX | SSGSX | HWSIX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.26 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.26 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.157 | -1.400 | -83% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 2500 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 770M | 5.51B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.50 | 204% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.64 | -5.70 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.12 | -7.91 | 1% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.01 | 19.32 | 445% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.07 | 20.44 | 206% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers