Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWSCX vs SSGSX
HWSCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HWSCX vs SSGSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value C
Price$53.78
Change+$0.12 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets719.58M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.95
Change+$0.15 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.31B
HWSCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWSCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWSCX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.31B vs. HWSCX (720M). HWSCX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HWSCX (0.68) vs SSGSX (0.48). HWSCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HWSCX (24 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). HWSCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). HWSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). HWSCX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.48 vs. HWSCX (-11.97). HWSCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.15 vs. SSGSX (18.06).
| HWSCX | SSGSX | HWSCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.26 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.26 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.339 | -1.034 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 720M | 5.31B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.48 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.97 | -8.48 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.22 | 1.10 | -384% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.15 | 18.06 | 339% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.76 | 18.76 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers