Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWSCX vs SSGSX
HWSCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HWSCX vs SSGSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value C
Price$54.64
Change+$0.32 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets776.81M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.47
Change+$0.28 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.82B
HWSCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWSCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWSCX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.82B vs. HWSCX (777M). HWSCX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HWSCX (0.72) vs SSGSX (0.51). HWSCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HWSCX (23 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). HWSCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). HWSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). HWSCX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.26 vs. HWSCX (-4.16). HWSCX return over 5 years is better than : 84.28 vs. SSGSX (29.33).
| HWSCX | SSGSX | HWSCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.26 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.26 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.238 | -2.068 | -12% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 777M | 5.82B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 0.51 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.16 | -1.26 | 330% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.96 | 2.38 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 84.28 | 29.33 | 287% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.26 | 16.52 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement