Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWSCX vs SSGSX
HWSCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HWSCX vs SSGSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value C
Price$55.63
Change+$0.08 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets664.12M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.64
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.12B
HWSCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWSCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWSCX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.13B vs. HWSCX (664M). HWSCX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HWSCX (0.69) vs SSGSX (0.48). HWSCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HWSCX (24 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). HWSCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.23). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. HWSCX (41.00). HWSCX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HWSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.53 vs. SSGSX (-2.42). HWSCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.18 vs. SSGSX (-0.63).
| HWSCX | SSGSX | HWSCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.23 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.23 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.055 | -1.723 | -119% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 664M | 5.13B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.48 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.53 | -2.42 | -63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.71 | 0.45 | 2,798% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.18 | -0.63 | -5,071% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.05 | 18.71 | 177% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers