Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWSCX vs SSGSX
HWSCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HWSCX vs SSGSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value C
Price$56.54
Change+$0.09 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets791.78M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.38
Change+$0.08 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
HWSCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWSCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWSCX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. HWSCX (792M). HWSCX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HWSCX (0.67) vs SSGSX (0.47). HWSCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HWSCX (24 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). HWSCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). HWSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). HWSCX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.56 vs. HWSCX (-2.62). HWSCX return over 5 years is better than : 70.48 vs. SSGSX (22.95).
| HWSCX | SSGSX | HWSCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.26 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.26 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.724 | 2.046 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 792M | 5.64B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.47 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.62 | -1.56 | 168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.12 | 3.97 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.48 | 22.95 | 307% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.04 | 24.71 | 77% |