Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWSCX vs SSGSX
HWSCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HWSCX vs SSGSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value C
Price$54.55
Change-$0.54 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets768.53M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.49
Change-$0.48 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.5B
HWSCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWSCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWSCX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.5B vs. HWSCX (769M). HWSCX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HWSCX (0.70) vs SSGSX (0.50). HWSCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HWSCX (24 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). HWSCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). HWSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). HWSCX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.53 vs. HWSCX (-5.89). HWSCX return over 5 years is better than : 62.31 vs. SSGSX (15.88).
| HWSCX | SSGSX | HWSCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.26 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.26 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.073 | -2.025 | -4% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 769M | 5.5B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.50 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.89 | -5.53 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.35 | -9.76 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.31 | 15.88 | 392% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.09 | 15.23 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement