Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWSCX vs SSGSX
HWSCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HWSCX vs SSGSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value C
Price$51.28
Change-$0.83 (-1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets740.05M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$42.53
Change-$0.78 (-1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.63B
HWSCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWSCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWSCX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.63B vs. HWSCX (740M). HWSCX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HWSCX (0.75) vs SSGSX (0.52). HWSCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HWSCX (23 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). HWSCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). HWSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). HWSCX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.36 vs. HWSCX (-9.77). HWSCX return over 5 years is better than : 68.73 vs. SSGSX (21.72).
| HWSCX | SSGSX | HWSCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.26 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.26 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.926 | -8.400 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 740M | 5.63B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.52 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.77 | -8.36 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.02 | -3.90 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.73 | 21.72 | 317% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.86 | 7.10 | -69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers