Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWNIX vs TRIGX
HWNIX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HWNIX vs TRIGX
Hotchkis & Wiley International Value I
Price$14.03
Change-$0.23 (-1.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.41M
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$20.92
Change-$0.28 (-1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.05B
HWNIX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWNIX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWNIX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 15B vs. HWNIX (4.41M). TRIGX pays higher dividends than HWNIX: TRIGX (2.11) vs HWNIX (1.90). HWNIX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HWNIX (9 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HWNIX (4.57) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HWNIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWNIX: TRIGX (2500) vs HWNIX (250000). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.76 vs. HWNIX (11.11). HWNIX (98.40) and TRIGX (96.83) have equivalent 5 years return.
| HWNIX | TRIGX | HWNIX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.87 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.57 | 0.87 | 525% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.940 | 23.131 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 2500 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.41M | 15B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.90 | 2.11 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.11 | 23.76 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.96 | 66.38 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.40 | 96.83 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 68.52 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers