Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWMZX vs VMVIX
HWMZX vs VMVIX Comparison
Open Charts HWMZX vs VMVIX
Hotchkis & Wiley Mid Cap Value Z
Price$57.39
Change+$0.60 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets391.28M
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Investor
Price$67.94
Change+$0.49 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.03B
HWMZX vs VMVIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWMZX vs. VMVIX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWMZX is a Buy and VMVIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMVIX has more cash in the bank: 32B vs. HWMZX (391M). VMVIX pays higher dividends than HWMZX: VMVIX (2.04) vs HWMZX (1.24). HWMZX was incepted earlier than VMVIX: HWMZX (6 years) vs VMVIX (19 years). HWMZX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VMVIX (0.19). HWMZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. VMVIX (19.00). VMVIX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWMZX: VMVIX (3000) vs HWMZX (1000000). VMVIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.09 vs. HWMZX (4.59). HWMZX return over 5 years is better than : 151.53 vs. VMVIX (67.46).
| HWMZX | VMVIX | HWMZX / VMVIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.19 | 463% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.19 | 463% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.543 | 6.748 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 3000 | 33,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 391M | 32B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 2.04 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.59 | 7.09 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.24 | 29.09 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 151.53 | 67.46 | 225% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 101.66 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement