Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWMZX vs VEVYX
HWMZX vs VEVYX Comparison
Open Charts HWMZX vs VEVYX
Hotchkis & Wiley Mid Cap Value Z
Price$61.15
Change+$3.58 (+6.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets393.04M
Victory Sycamore Established Value Y
Price$48.07
Change+$1.75 (+3.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.2B
HWMZX vs VEVYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWMZX vs. VEVYX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWMZX is a Buy and VEVYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEVYX has more cash in the bank: 16.2B vs. HWMZX (393M). HWMZX pays higher dividends than VEVYX: HWMZX (1.52) vs VEVYX (0.89). HWMZX was incepted earlier than VEVYX: HWMZX (6 years) vs VEVYX (13 years). HWMZX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VEVYX (0.66). VEVYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. HWMZX (31.00). HWMZX (1000000) and VEVYX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HWMZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.51 vs. VEVYX (2.79). HWMZX return over 5 years is better than : 77.34 vs. VEVYX (20.54).
| HWMZX | VEVYX | HWMZX / VEVYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.66 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.66 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.943 | 6.775 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 393M | 16.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.52 | 0.89 | 171% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.51 | 2.79 | 412% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.31 | 3.61 | 730% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.34 | 20.54 | 377% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 88.67 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers