Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWMZX vs VEVYX
HWMZX vs VEVYX Comparison
Open Charts HWMZX vs VEVYX
Hotchkis & Wiley Mid Cap Value Z
Price$56.36
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets367.94M
Victory Sycamore Established Value Y
Price$45.94
Change+$0.15 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.58B
HWMZX vs VEVYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWMZX vs. VEVYX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWMZX is a Hold and VEVYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEVYX has more cash in the bank: 16.6B vs. HWMZX (368M). HWMZX pays higher dividends than VEVYX: HWMZX (1.23) vs VEVYX (1.02). HWMZX was incepted earlier than VEVYX: HWMZX (6 years) vs VEVYX (13 years). HWMZX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VEVYX (0.66). VEVYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. HWMZX (31.00). HWMZX (1000000) and VEVYX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HWMZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.21 vs. VEVYX (-12.29). HWMZX return over 5 years is better than : 136.21 vs. VEVYX (31.88).
| HWMZX | VEVYX | HWMZX / VEVYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.66 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.66 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.828 | 0.751 | 376% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 368M | 16.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 1.02 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.21 | -12.29 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.24 | 7.07 | 498% |
| Returns for 5 years | 136.21 | 31.88 | 427% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 48.25 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement