Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWMZX vs MVCAX
HWMZX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts HWMZX vs MVCAX
Hotchkis & Wiley Mid Cap Value Z
Price$58.90
Change+$0.03 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets383.17M
HWMZX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWMZX vs. MVCAX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWMZX is a StrongBuy and MVCAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 16.8B vs. HWMZX (383M). HWMZX pays higher dividends than MVCAX: HWMZX (1.22) vs MVCAX (0.83). HWMZX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: HWMZX (6 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). MVCAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than HWMZX (0.88). HWMZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. MVCAX (24.00). MVCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWMZX: MVCAX (1000) vs HWMZX (1000000). HWMZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.50 vs. MVCAX (-1.74). HWMZX return over 5 years is better than : 90.00 vs. MVCAX (23.93).
| HWMZX | MVCAX | HWMZX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.99 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.00 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.462 | -0.652 | -1,145% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 383M | 16.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 0.83 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.50 | -1.74 | -431% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.67 | 13.98 | 241% |
| Returns for 5 years | 90.00 | 23.93 | 376% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 72.86 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers