Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWMZX vs MVCAX
HWMZX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts HWMZX vs MVCAX
Hotchkis & Wiley Mid Cap Value Z
Price$56.36
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets367.94M
HWMZX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWMZX vs. MVCAX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWMZX is a Hold and MVCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 16.9B vs. HWMZX (368M). HWMZX pays higher dividends than MVCAX: HWMZX (1.23) vs MVCAX (0.84). HWMZX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: HWMZX (6 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). MVCAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than HWMZX (0.88). HWMZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. MVCAX (27.00). MVCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWMZX: MVCAX (1000) vs HWMZX (1000000). HWMZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.21 vs. MVCAX (-9.14). HWMZX return over 5 years is better than : 136.21 vs. MVCAX (44.40).
| HWMZX | MVCAX | HWMZX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.99 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.00 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.828 | 3.585 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 368M | 16.9B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 0.84 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.21 | -9.14 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.24 | 20.07 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 136.21 | 44.40 | 307% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 70.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement