Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWMZX vs MVCAX
HWMZX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts HWMZX vs MVCAX
Hotchkis & Wiley Mid Cap Value Z
Price$55.61
Change+$0.21 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets393.09M
HWMZX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 17.3B vs. HWMZX (393M). HWMZX pays higher dividends than MVCAX: HWMZX (1.32) vs MVCAX (0.87). HWMZX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: HWMZX (6 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). MVCAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than HWMZX (0.88). HWMZX (28.00) and MVCAX (27.00) have comparable annual turnover. MVCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWMZX: MVCAX (1000) vs HWMZX (1000000). HWMZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.56 vs. MVCAX (1.09). HWMZX return over 5 years is better than : 167.09 vs. MVCAX (60.39).
| HWMZX | MVCAX | HWMZX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.99 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.00 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.460 | 2.934 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 393M | 17.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 0.87 | 151% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.56 | 1.09 | 417% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.33 | 18.70 | 200% |
| Returns for 5 years | 167.09 | 60.39 | 277% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 64.61 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement