Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWMZX vs JVMCX
HWMZX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts HWMZX vs JVMCX
Hotchkis & Wiley Mid Cap Value Z
Price$61.15
Change+$3.58 (+6.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets393.04M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$26.89
Change-$0.78 (-2.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.66B
HWMZX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWMZX vs. JVMCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWMZX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.7B vs. HWMZX (393M). HWMZX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: HWMZX (1.52) vs JVMCX (0.00). HWMZX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: HWMZX (6 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than HWMZX (0.88). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. HWMZX (31.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWMZX: JVMCX (1000) vs HWMZX (1000000). HWMZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.51 vs. JVMCX (3.34). HWMZX return over 5 years is better than : 77.34 vs. JVMCX (15.97).
| HWMZX | JVMCX | HWMZX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.85 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.86 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.943 | 5.121 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 393M | 24.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.52 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.51 | 3.34 | 344% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.31 | 6.94 | 379% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.34 | 15.97 | 484% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 61.82 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers