Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWMZX vs JVMCX
HWMZX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts HWMZX vs JVMCX
Hotchkis & Wiley Mid Cap Value Z
Price$55.07
Change-$0.31 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets378.74M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.41
Change-$0.21 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.59B
HWMZX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWMZX vs. JVMCX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWMZX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.6B vs. HWMZX (379M). HWMZX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: HWMZX (1.31) vs JVMCX (0.00). HWMZX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: HWMZX (6 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than HWMZX (0.88). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. HWMZX (28.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWMZX: JVMCX (1000) vs HWMZX (1000000). HWMZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.43 vs. JVMCX (-0.87). HWMZX return over 5 years is better than : 135.76 vs. JVMCX (43.38).
| HWMZX | JVMCX | HWMZX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.87 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.88 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.474 | 8.340 | 6% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 379M | 23.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.43 | -0.87 | -49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.76 | 8.57 | 265% |
| Returns for 5 years | 135.76 | 43.38 | 313% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 32.89 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement