Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWMZX vs JVMCX
HWMZX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts HWMZX vs JVMCX
Hotchkis & Wiley Mid Cap Value Z
Price$56.36
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets367.94M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.55
Change+$0.12 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.74B
HWMZX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWMZX vs. JVMCX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWMZX is a Hold and JVMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. HWMZX (368M). HWMZX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: HWMZX (1.23) vs JVMCX (0.00). HWMZX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: HWMZX (6 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than HWMZX (0.88). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. HWMZX (31.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWMZX: JVMCX (1000) vs HWMZX (1000000). HWMZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.21 vs. JVMCX (-6.45). HWMZX return over 5 years is better than : 136.21 vs. JVMCX (40.87).
| HWMZX | JVMCX | HWMZX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.85 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.86 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.828 | 8.893 | 32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 368M | 23.7B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.21 | -6.45 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.24 | 21.60 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 136.21 | 40.87 | 333% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 38.46 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement