Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWGIX vs TEDSX
HWGIX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts HWGIX vs TEDSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value I
Price$16.05
Change-$0.55 (-3.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.32M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$32.38
Change-$0.11 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.71B
HWGIX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWGIX vs. TEDSX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWGIX is a Buy and TEDSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.71B vs. HWGIX (41.3M). HWGIX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: HWGIX (1.62) vs TEDSX (0.79). HWGIX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: HWGIX (13 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than HWGIX (1.06). HWGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. TEDSX (34.55). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWGIX: TEDSX (1000) vs HWGIX (250000). HWGIX (12.08) and TEDSX (11.97) have marching annual gain over last year. HWGIX return over 5 years is better than : 33.23 vs. TEDSX (16.32).
| HWGIX | TEDSX | HWGIX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.96 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.96 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.360 | 3.450 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 1000 | 25,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.3M | 9.71B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.62 | 0.79 | 204% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.08 | 11.97 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.16 | 15.51 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.23 | 16.32 | 204% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.02 | 29.34 | 290% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement