Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWGAX vs TRZRX
HWGAX vs TRZRX Comparison
Open Charts HWGAX vs TRZRX
Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value A
Price$16.36
Change+$0.12 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.68M
T. Rowe Price Real Assets Z
Price$16.34
Change+$0.03 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.42B
HWGAX vs TRZRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRZRX has more cash in the bank: 11.4B vs. HWGAX (39.7M). TRZRX pays higher dividends than HWGAX: TRZRX (2.19) vs HWGAX (1.00). HWGAX was incepted earlier than TRZRX: HWGAX (12 years) vs TRZRX (5 years). HWGAX (1.51) is less costly to investors than TRZRX (0.65). HWGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. TRZRX (41.30). TRZRX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWGAX: TRZRX (0) vs HWGAX (2500). TRZRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. HWGAX (2.05). HWGAX return over 5 years is better than : 77.67 vs. TRZRX (62.97).
| HWGAX | TRZRX | HWGAX / TRZRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.65 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.335 | 18.039 | 96% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.7M | 11.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 2.19 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.05 | 13.26 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.51 | 33.57 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.67 | 62.97 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.79 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement