Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWGAX vs TRZRX
HWGAX vs TRZRX Comparison
Open Charts HWGAX vs TRZRX
Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value A
Price$16.13
Change+$0.10 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.82M
T. Rowe Price Real Assets Z
Price$15.74
Change-$0.05 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.93B
HWGAX vs TRZRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRZRX has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. HWGAX (39.8M). TRZRX pays higher dividends than HWGAX: TRZRX (2.34) vs HWGAX (1.03). HWGAX was incepted earlier than TRZRX: HWGAX (12 years) vs TRZRX (5 years). HWGAX (1.51) is less costly to investors than TRZRX (0.65). HWGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. TRZRX (41.30). TRZRX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWGAX: TRZRX (0) vs HWGAX (2500). TRZRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.10 vs. HWGAX (3.10). HWGAX return over 5 years is better than : 81.77 vs. TRZRX (60.39).
| HWGAX | TRZRX | HWGAX / TRZRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.65 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.544 | 12.670 | 123% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.8M | 10.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 2.34 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.10 | 10.10 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.76 | 28.95 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.77 | 60.39 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.54 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement