Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWGAX vs TEDSX
HWGAX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts HWGAX vs TEDSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value A
Price$16.45
Change-$0.15 (-0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.42M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$32.44
Change-$0.36 (-1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.43B
HWGAX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWGAX vs. TEDSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWGAX is a Buy and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.43B vs. HWGAX (40.4M). HWGAX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: HWGAX (1.00) vs TEDSX (0.75). HWGAX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: HWGAX (12 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than HWGAX (1.34). HWGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. TEDSX (34.55). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWGAX: TEDSX (1000) vs HWGAX (2500). TEDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.08 vs. HWGAX (2.35). HWGAX return over 5 years is better than : 58.17 vs. TEDSX (27.14).
| HWGAX | TEDSX | HWGAX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.96 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.96 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.911 | 16.851 | 112% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.4M | 9.43B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 0.75 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.35 | 5.08 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.20 | 17.27 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.17 | 27.14 | 214% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.03 | 10.70 | 570% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement