Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWGAX vs TEDSX
HWGAX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts HWGAX vs TEDSX
Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value A
Price$16.48
Change+$0.07 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.74M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$32.74
Change+$0.18 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.47B
HWGAX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWGAX vs. TEDSX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWGAX is a Buy and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.47B vs. HWGAX (39.7M). HWGAX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: HWGAX (0.99) vs TEDSX (0.85). HWGAX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: HWGAX (12 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than HWGAX (1.34). HWGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. TEDSX (34.55). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWGAX: TEDSX (1000) vs HWGAX (2500). TEDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.93 vs. HWGAX (0.69). HWGAX return over 5 years is better than : 79.51 vs. TEDSX (36.44).
| HWGAX | TEDSX | HWGAX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.96 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.96 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.052 | 16.637 | 109% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.7M | 9.47B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.85 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.69 | 2.93 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.01 | 28.46 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.51 | 36.44 | 218% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.90 | 9.22 | 606% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement