Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCIX vs RMFCX
HWCIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HWCIX vs RMFCX
Hotchkis & Wiley Disciplined Value I
Price$30.63
Change-$1.21 (-3.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.35M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.14
Change-$1.74 (-2.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
HWCIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCIX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. HWCIX (81.4M). HWCIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: HWCIX (1.43) vs RMFCX (1.24). HWCIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HWCIX (21 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). HWCIX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). HWCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCIX: RMFCX (250) vs HWCIX (250000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.45 vs. HWCIX (3.76). HWCIX return over 5 years is better than : 52.71 vs. RMFCX (44.16).
| HWCIX | RMFCX | HWCIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.91 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.998 | 2.244 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.4M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 1.24 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.76 | 7.45 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.12 | 28.73 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.71 | 44.16 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 177.39 | 105.79 | 168% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement