Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCIX vs RMEBX
HWCIX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HWCIX vs RMEBX
Hotchkis & Wiley Disciplined Value I
Price$31.51
Change-$0.03 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.63M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.70
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
HWCIX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCIX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCIX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. HWCIX (80.6M). HWCIX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HWCIX (1.72) vs RMEBX (1.09). HWCIX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HWCIX (21 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than HWCIX (1.01). HWCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCIX: RMEBX (250) vs HWCIX (250000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.57 vs. HWCIX (1.64). HWCIX return over 5 years is better than : 107.99 vs. RMEBX (55.29).
| HWCIX | RMEBX | HWCIX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.07 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.07 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.252 | 11.308 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.6M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.72 | 1.09 | 158% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.64 | 7.57 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.63 | 31.59 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 107.99 | 55.29 | 195% |
| Returns for 10 years | 150.71 | 89.40 | 169% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement