Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCIX vs RMEBX
HWCIX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HWCIX vs RMEBX
Hotchkis & Wiley Disciplined Value I
Price$30.30
Change+$0.13 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.09M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.71
Change+$0.23 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
HWCIX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCIX vs. RMEBX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCIX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. HWCIX (81.1M). HWCIX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HWCIX (1.69) vs RMEBX (1.03). HWCIX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HWCIX (21 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) and HWCIX (1.02) have similar cost to investors . HWCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCIX: RMEBX (250) vs HWCIX (250000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.97 vs. HWCIX (5.43). HWCIX return over 5 years is better than : 62.28 vs. RMEBX (45.21).
| HWCIX | RMEBX | HWCIX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.07 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.07 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.018 | 9.599 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.1M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 1.03 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.43 | 7.97 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.47 | 28.41 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.28 | 45.21 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 143.93 | 90.05 | 160% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement