Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCIX vs RMEBX
HWCIX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HWCIX vs RMEBX
Hotchkis & Wiley Disciplined Value I
Price$31.45
Change+$0.17 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.85
Change+$0.16 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.18B
HWCIX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCIX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCIX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. HWCIX (80M). HWCIX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HWCIX (1.70) vs RMEBX (1.05). HWCIX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HWCIX (21 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) and HWCIX (1.02) have similar cost to investors . HWCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCIX: RMEBX (250) vs HWCIX (250000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.81 vs. HWCIX (-3.62). HWCIX return over 5 years is better than : 105.18 vs. RMEBX (55.95).
| HWCIX | RMEBX | HWCIX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.07 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.07 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.042 | 13.527 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 1.05 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.62 | 4.81 | -75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.96 | 38.19 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 105.18 | 55.95 | 188% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.70 | 89.36 | 162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement