Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCAX vs RMFCX
HWCAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HWCAX vs RMFCX
Hotchkis & Wiley Disciplined Value A
Price$30.81
Change-$1.18 (-3.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.35M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.14
Change-$1.74 (-2.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
HWCAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCAX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. HWCAX (81.4M). HWCAX (1.30) and RMFCX (1.24) have matching dividends . HWCAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HWCAX (21 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). HWCAX (1.26) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). HWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCAX: RMFCX (250) vs HWCAX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.45 vs. HWCAX (3.70). HWCAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.71 vs. RMFCX (44.16).
| HWCAX | RMFCX | HWCAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.91 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.91 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.986 | 2.244 | 89% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.4M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 1.24 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.70 | 7.45 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.58 | 28.73 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.71 | 44.16 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 172.74 | 105.79 | 163% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement