Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCAX vs RMFCX
HWCAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HWCAX vs RMFCX
Hotchkis & Wiley Disciplined Value A
Price$31.90
Change-$0.24 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.63M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.57
Change-$0.70 (-1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
HWCAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCAX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. HWCAX (80.6M). HWCAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: HWCAX (1.45) vs RMFCX (1.21). HWCAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HWCAX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). HWCAX (1.26) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). HWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCAX: RMFCX (250) vs HWCAX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. HWCAX (-3.54). HWCAX return over 5 years is better than : 84.61 vs. RMFCX (54.90).
| HWCAX | RMFCX | HWCAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.91 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.91 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.714 | 15.093 | 78% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.6M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 1.21 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.54 | 6.67 | -53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.12 | 30.56 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 84.61 | 54.90 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 146.91 | 94.04 | 156% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers