Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCAX vs RMEBX
HWCAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HWCAX vs RMEBX
Hotchkis & Wiley Disciplined Value A
Price$31.70
Change-$0.03 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.63M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.71
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
HWCAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. HWCAX (80.6M). HWCAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HWCAX (1.46) vs RMEBX (1.09). HWCAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HWCAX (21 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). HWCAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). HWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCAX: RMEBX (250) vs HWCAX (2500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.57 vs. HWCAX (-0.08). HWCAX return over 5 years is better than : 103.95 vs. RMEBX (55.29).
| HWCAX | RMEBX | HWCAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.07 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.07 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.184 | 11.308 | 90% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.6M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 1.09 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.08 | 7.57 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.62 | 31.59 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 103.95 | 55.29 | 188% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.69 | 89.40 | 162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement