Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWCAX vs RMEBX
HWCAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HWCAX vs RMEBX
Hotchkis & Wiley Disciplined Value A
Price$31.90
Change-$0.24 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.63M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.91
Change-$0.71 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
HWCAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWCAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWCAX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. HWCAX (80.6M). HWCAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HWCAX (1.45) vs RMEBX (1.05). HWCAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HWCAX (21 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). HWCAX (1.26) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). HWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWCAX: RMEBX (250) vs HWCAX (2500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.55 vs. HWCAX (-3.54). HWCAX return over 5 years is better than : 84.61 vs. RMEBX (53.80).
| HWCAX | RMEBX | HWCAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.07 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.07 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.714 | 14.940 | 78% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.6M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 1.05 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.54 | 6.55 | -54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.12 | 30.03 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 84.61 | 53.80 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 146.91 | 92.20 | 159% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers