HWC
Price
$57.65
Change
+$0.21 (+0.37%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
4B
16 days until earnings call
WSFS
Price
$55.03
Change
+$0.68 (+1.25%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
2.71B
29 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HWC vs WSFS

Header iconHWC vs WSFS Comparison
Open Charts HWC vs WSFSBanner chart's image
Hancock Whitney
Price$57.65
Change+$0.21 (+0.37%)
Volume$700.12K
Capitalization4B
WSFS Financial
Price$55.03
Change+$0.68 (+1.25%)
Volume$547.4K
Capitalization2.71B
HWC vs WSFS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WSFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HWC vs. WSFS commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWC is a Buy and WSFS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (HWC: $57.65 vs. WSFS: $55.03)
Brand notoriety: HWC and WSFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HWC: 127% vs. WSFS: 164%
Market capitalization -- HWC: $4B vs. WSFS: $2.71B
HWC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4B. WSFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HWC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWSFS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HWC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WSFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WSFS is a better buy in the long-term than HWC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HWC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WSFS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HWC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WSFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HWC is a better buy in the short-term than WSFS.

Price Growth

HWC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +7.54% price change this week, while WSFS (@Regional Banks) price change was +6.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

HWC is expected to report earnings on Jul 15, 2025.

WSFS is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.42% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HWC($4B) has a higher market cap than WSFS($2.71B). WSFS (10.04) and HWC (9.98) have similar P/E ratio . HWC YTD gains are higher at: 7.123 vs. WSFS (4.167). WSFS has more cash in the bank: 606M vs. HWC (561M). WSFS has less debt than HWC: WSFS (895M) vs HWC (1.52B). HWC has higher revenues than WSFS: HWC (1.37B) vs WSFS (1.02B).
HWCWSFSHWC / WSFS
Capitalization4B2.71B148%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.1234.167171%
P/E Ratio9.9810.0499%
Revenue1.37B1.02B135%
Total Cash561M606M93%
Total Debt1.52B895M169%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HWC vs WSFS: Fundamental Ratings
HWC
WSFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2617
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2235
SMR RATING
1..100
1012
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4649
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5729
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HWC's Valuation (60) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WSFS (66) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WSFS (35) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's SMR Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WSFS (12) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WSFS (49) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (57) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WSFS’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HWCWSFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WSFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRGOX87.360.70
+0.81%
T. Rowe Price Lrg Cp Gr Inv
NOLCX30.220.16
+0.53%
Northern Large Cap Core
FFARX16.400.07
+0.43%
Franklin Global Allocation R
PJDCX17.780.05
+0.28%
PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend C
CSUZX24.810.02
+0.08%
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Z

HWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWC has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HWC jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWC
1D Price
Change %
HWC100%
+0.37%
FNB - HWC
93%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
ASB - HWC
93%
Closely correlated
-0.49%
ABCB - HWC
92%
Closely correlated
+2.80%
FULT - HWC
92%
Closely correlated
-1.15%
UBSI - HWC
92%
Closely correlated
-0.90%
More

WSFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WSFS has been closely correlated with HWC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WSFS jumps, then HWC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WSFS
1D Price
Change %
WSFS100%
+1.25%
HWC - WSFS
91%
Closely correlated
+0.37%
ABCB - WSFS
91%
Closely correlated
+2.80%
UBSI - WSFS
91%
Closely correlated
-0.90%
UCB - WSFS
91%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
SBCF - WSFS
91%
Closely correlated
+3.00%
More