HWC
Price
$48.65
Change
+$0.13 (+0.27%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
4B
93 days until earnings call
WAFD
Price
$28.03
Change
+$0.51 (+1.85%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.38B
81 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HWC vs WAFD

Header iconHWC vs WAFD Comparison
Open Charts HWC vs WAFDBanner chart's image
Hancock Whitney
Price$48.65
Change+$0.13 (+0.27%)
Volume$1.05M
Capitalization4B
WaFd
Price$28.03
Change+$0.51 (+1.85%)
Volume$752.17K
Capitalization2.38B
HWC vs WAFD Comparison Chart
Loading...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WAFD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HWC vs. WAFD commentary
Apr 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWC is a Hold and WAFD is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 20, 2025
Stock price -- (HWC: $48.65 vs. WAFD: $28.03)
Brand notoriety: HWC and WAFD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HWC: 128% vs. WAFD: 112%
Market capitalization -- HWC: $4B vs. WAFD: $2.38B
HWC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4B. WAFD’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HWC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWAFD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HWC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WAFD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HWC is a better buy in the long-term than WAFD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HWC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WAFD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HWC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • WAFD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HWC is a better buy in the short-term than WAFD.

Price Growth

HWC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.35% price change this week, while WAFD (@Regional Banks) price change was +14.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

HWC is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

WAFD is expected to report earnings on Jul 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HWC($4B) has a higher market cap than WAFD($2.38B). HWC has higher P/E ratio than WAFD: HWC (9.98) vs WAFD (8.33). HWC YTD gains are higher at: -10.353 vs. WAFD (-12.265). HWC has less debt than WAFD: HWC (1.52B) vs WAFD (3.88B). HWC has higher revenues than WAFD: HWC (1.37B) vs WAFD (714M).
HWCWAFDHWC / WAFD
Capitalization4B2.38B169%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-10.353-12.26584%
P/E Ratio9.988.33120%
Revenue1.37B714M191%
Total Cash561MN/A-
Total Debt1.52B3.88B39%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HWC vs WAFD: Fundamental Ratings
HWC
WAFD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2452
SMR RATING
1..100
1112
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5857
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5017
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HWC's Valuation (54) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WAFD (54) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to WAFD’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WAFD (52) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to WAFD’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's SMR Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WAFD (12) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to WAFD’s over the last 12 months.

WAFD's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (58) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WAFD’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

WAFD's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HWC (50) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WAFD’s stock grew somewhat faster than HWC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HWCWAFD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WAFD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME26.780.53
+2.02%
GameStop Corp
AAPL196.982.71
+1.39%
Apple
BTC.X85063.414000612.609400
+0.73%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY525.66N/A
N/A
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
TSLA241.37-0.18
-0.07%
Tesla

HWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWC has been closely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HWC jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWC
1D Price
Change %
HWC100%
+0.27%
ASB - HWC
93%
Closely correlated
+1.58%
FNB - HWC
92%
Closely correlated
+3.11%
ABCB - HWC
92%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
ONB - HWC
91%
Closely correlated
+0.67%
UCB - HWC
91%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
More