HWC
Price
$53.78
Change
-$1.42 (-2.57%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
4B
36 days until earnings call
SSBK
Price
$34.54
Change
-$0.17 (-0.49%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
230.2M
42 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HWC vs SSBK

Header iconHWC vs SSBK Comparison
Open Charts HWC vs SSBKBanner chart's image
Hancock Whitney
Price$53.78
Change-$1.42 (-2.57%)
Volume$932.71K
Capitalization4B
Southern States Bancshares
Price$34.54
Change-$0.17 (-0.49%)
Volume$36.53K
Capitalization230.2M
HWC vs SSBK Comparison Chart
Loading...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SSBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HWC vs. SSBK commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWC is a StrongBuy and SSBK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (HWC: $53.78 vs. SSBK: $34.54)
Brand notoriety: HWC and SSBK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HWC: 147% vs. SSBK: 108%
Market capitalization -- HWC: $4B vs. SSBK: $230.2M
HWC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4B. SSBK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $230.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HWC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSSBK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HWC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SSBK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HWC is a better buy in the long-term than SSBK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HWC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SSBK’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HWC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SSBK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SSBK is a better buy in the short-term than HWC.

Price Growth

HWC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.34% price change this week, while SSBK (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

HWC is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

SSBK is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.53% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HWC($4B) has a higher market cap than SSBK($230M). HWC has higher P/E ratio than SSBK: HWC (9.98) vs SSBK (7.26). SSBK YTD gains are higher at: 4.258 vs. HWC (-0.069). HWC has more cash in the bank: 561M vs. SSBK (31M). SSBK has less debt than HWC: SSBK (184M) vs HWC (1.52B). HWC has higher revenues than SSBK: HWC (1.37B) vs SSBK (89M).
HWCSSBKHWC / SSBK
Capitalization4B230M1,740%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.0694.258-2%
P/E Ratio9.987.26137%
Revenue1.37B89M1,536%
Total Cash561M31M1,810%
Total Debt1.52B184M824%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HWC: Fundamental Ratings
HWC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
22
SMR RATING
1..100
10
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HWCSSBK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SSBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CONY7.710.02
+0.26%
YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
PTBD19.58-0.07
-0.36%
Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF
GJAN39.15-0.22
-0.56%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buffr ETF - Jan
VONV83.34-0.83
-0.99%
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
DUSL61.32-1.91
-3.02%
Direxion Dly Industrials Bull 3X ShsETF

HWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWC has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HWC jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWC
1D Price
Change %
HWC100%
-2.57%
FNB - HWC
93%
Closely correlated
-2.51%
ASB - HWC
93%
Closely correlated
-2.77%
ABCB - HWC
93%
Closely correlated
-2.61%
FULT - HWC
92%
Closely correlated
-1.89%
UBSI - HWC
92%
Closely correlated
-2.03%
More

SSBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SSBK has been closely correlated with EFSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SSBK jumps, then EFSC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSBK
1D Price
Change %
SSBK100%
-0.49%
EFSC - SSBK
75%
Closely correlated
-2.19%
ASB - SSBK
75%
Closely correlated
-2.77%
CAC - SSBK
74%
Closely correlated
-3.06%
BY - SSBK
74%
Closely correlated
-1.79%
HWC - SSBK
74%
Closely correlated
-2.57%
More