HWC
Price
$65.62
Change
-$0.22 (-0.33%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
5.49B
38 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SFNC
Price
$19.63
Change
+$0.06 (+0.31%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
2.84B
44 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HWC vs SFNC

Header iconHWC vs SFNC Comparison
Open Charts HWC vs SFNCBanner chart's image
Hancock Whitney
Price$65.62
Change-$0.22 (-0.33%)
Volume$755.88K
Capitalization5.49B
Simmons First National
Price$19.63
Change+$0.06 (+0.31%)
Volume$1.1M
Capitalization2.84B
HWC vs SFNC Comparison Chart in %
HWC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SFNC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HWC vs. SFNC commentary
Dec 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWC is a Buy and SFNC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 14, 2025
Stock price -- (HWC: $65.84 vs. SFNC: $19.57)
Brand notoriety: HWC and SFNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HWC: 90% vs. SFNC: 82%
Market capitalization -- HWC: $5.49B vs. SFNC: $2.84B
HWC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $5.49B. SFNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HWC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSFNC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HWC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SFNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HWC is a better buy in the long-term than SFNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HWC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFNC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HWC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SFNC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both HWC and SFNC are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

HWC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.60% price change this week, while SFNC (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

HWC is expected to report earnings on Jan 21, 2026.

SFNC is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HWC($5.49B) has a higher market cap than SFNC($2.84B). SFNC has higher P/E ratio than HWC: SFNC (13.73) vs HWC (11.78). HWC YTD gains are higher at: 23.214 vs. SFNC (-8.875). HWC has more cash in the bank: 513M vs. SFNC (398M). SFNC has less debt than HWC: SFNC (668M) vs HWC (1.63B). HWC has higher revenues than SFNC: HWC (1.49B) vs SFNC (50.2M).
HWCSFNCHWC / SFNC
Capitalization5.49B2.84B193%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD23.214-8.875-262%
P/E Ratio11.7813.7386%
Revenue1.49B50.2M2,958%
Total Cash513M398M129%
Total Debt1.63B668M245%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HWC vs SFNC: Fundamental Ratings
HWC
SFNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2476
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2482
SMR RATING
1..100
1215
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4554
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5786
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HWC's Valuation (39) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFNC (73) in the Major Banks industry. This means that HWC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFNC (82) in the Major Banks industry. This means that HWC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (15) in the Major Banks industry. This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (54) in the Major Banks industry. This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (86) in the Major Banks industry. This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HWCSFNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HWC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SFNC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KMVAX38.580.37
+0.97%
Kirr Marbach Partners Value
CAVAX18.260.10
+0.55%
SEI Catholic Values Equity F (SCVT)
PDIFX17.040.05
+0.29%
Principal Diversified International R6
CAFEX45.450.11
+0.24%
American Funds AMCAP 529E
PHEIX13.12-0.74
-5.34%
T. Rowe Price Hedged Equity I

HWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWC has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HWC jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWC
1D Price
Change %
HWC100%
+0.20%
FNB - HWC
92%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
ASB - HWC
91%
Closely correlated
+0.26%
UCB - HWC
91%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
ONB - HWC
90%
Closely correlated
+0.26%
UBSI - HWC
90%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
More

SFNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFNC has been closely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFNC jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFNC
1D Price
Change %
SFNC100%
-0.41%
UCB - SFNC
89%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
HOMB - SFNC
87%
Closely correlated
+0.10%
WSFS - SFNC
87%
Closely correlated
+0.91%
HWC - SFNC
87%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
UBSI - SFNC
87%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
More