HWAUF
Price
$0.48
Change
+$0.03 (+6.67%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
34.35M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NFGC
Price
$2.05
Change
-$0.10 (-4.65%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
510.87M
126 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HWAUF vs NFGC

Header iconHWAUF vs NFGC Comparison
Open Charts HWAUF vs NFGCBanner chart's image
Headwater Gold
Price$0.48
Change+$0.03 (+6.67%)
Volume$83.63K
Capitalization34.35M
New Found Gold
Price$2.05
Change-$0.10 (-4.65%)
Volume$1.31M
Capitalization510.87M
HWAUF vs NFGC Comparison Chart in %
HWAUF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NFGC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HWAUF vs. NFGC commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWAUF is a StrongBuy and NFGC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (HWAUF: $0.45 vs. NFGC: $2.15)
Brand notoriety: HWAUF and NFGC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HWAUF: 129% vs. NFGC: 79%
Market capitalization -- HWAUF: $34.35M vs. NFGC: $510.87M
HWAUF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $34.35M. NFGC’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $510.87M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $115.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HWAUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNFGC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HWAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NFGC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HWAUF and NFGC are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HWAUF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NFGC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HWAUF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • NFGC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HWAUF is a better buy in the short-term than NFGC.

Price Growth

HWAUF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +8.33% price change this week, while NFGC (@Precious Metals) price change was +12.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6505.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

NFGC is expected to report earnings on Mar 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.39% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NFGC($511M) has a higher market cap than HWAUF($34.4M). HWAUF YTD gains are higher at: 200.000 vs. NFGC (18.132). HWAUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -4.11M vs. NFGC (-43.68M). NFGC has more cash in the bank: 66.7M vs. HWAUF (2.18M). NFGC has less debt than HWAUF: NFGC (79.6K) vs HWAUF (180K). HWAUF (0) and NFGC (0) have equivalent revenues.
HWAUFNFGCHWAUF / NFGC
Capitalization34.4M511M7%
EBITDA-4.11M-43.68M9%
Gain YTD200.00018.1321,103%
P/E Ratio21.18N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash2.18M66.7M3%
Total Debt180K79.6K226%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HWAUFNFGC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HWAUF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NFGC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VSQAX18.860.10
+0.53%
Invesco MSCI World SRI Index A
LMREX33.050.07
+0.21%
ClearBridge Mid Cap R
SCVAX35.62N/A
N/A
Allspring Small Company Value A
PRJQX50.58-0.02
-0.04%
PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities R6
GGRAX9.04-0.02
-0.22%
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth A

HWAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HWAUF and NFGC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HWAUF and NFGC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWAUF
1D Price
Change %
HWAUF100%
+9.71%
NFGC - HWAUF
25%
Poorly correlated
+5.39%
GFI - HWAUF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
ABMBF - HWAUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-19.59%
TORXF - HWAUF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.81%
EQX - HWAUF
21%
Poorly correlated
+5.97%
More

NFGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NFGC has been loosely correlated with TORXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NFGC jumps, then TORXF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NFGC
1D Price
Change %
NFGC100%
+5.39%
TORXF - NFGC
56%
Loosely correlated
+3.81%
KNTNF - NFGC
52%
Loosely correlated
+4.13%
WDOFF - NFGC
50%
Loosely correlated
+3.96%
LUGDF - NFGC
49%
Loosely correlated
+4.88%
AEM - NFGC
49%
Loosely correlated
+3.13%
More