Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HWACX vs JVMCX
HWACX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts HWACX vs JVMCX
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opps C
Price$37.47
Change+$0.61 (+1.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets839.13M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.21
Change+$0.32 (+1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.73B
HWACX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HWACX vs. JVMCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HWACX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.7B vs. HWACX (839M). HWACX (0.00) and JVMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . HWACX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: HWACX (22 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). HWACX (1.93) and JVMCX (1.86) have similar cost to investors . HWACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWACX: JVMCX (1000) vs HWACX (2500). HWACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.57 vs. JVMCX (3.34). HWACX return over 5 years is better than : 25.33 vs. JVMCX (15.97).
| HWACX | JVMCX | HWACX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.85 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.86 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.347 | 5.121 | 26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 839M | 24.7B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.57 | 3.34 | 256% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.98 | 6.94 | 245% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.33 | 15.97 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.10 | 61.82 | 162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement