HVT
Price
$20.41
Change
-$0.09 (-0.44%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
551.83M
37 days until earnings call
RUSHA
Price
$50.99
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
4.12B
30 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HVT vs RUSHA

Header iconHVT vs RUSHA Comparison
Open Charts HVT vs RUSHABanner chart's image
Haverty Furniture Companies
Price$20.41
Change-$0.09 (-0.44%)
Volume$210.42K
Capitalization551.83M
Rush Enterprises
Price$50.99
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$338
Capitalization4.12B
HVT vs RUSHA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HVT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HVT vs. RUSHA commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HVT is a Buy and RUSHA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (HVT: $20.41 vs. RUSHA: $50.99)
Brand notoriety: HVT and RUSHA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HVT: 167% vs. RUSHA: 0%
Market capitalization -- HVT: $551.83M vs. RUSHA: $4.12B
HVT [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $551.83M. RUSHA’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $4.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HVT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHA’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HVT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RUSHA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHA is a better buy in the long-term than HVT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HVT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HVT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • RUSHA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HVT is a better buy in the short-term than RUSHA.

Price Growth

HVT (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +0.74% price change this week, while RUSHA (@Specialty Stores) price change was +3.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +2.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

HVT is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+2.51% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RUSHA($4.12B) has a higher market cap than HVT($552M). RUSHA has higher P/E ratio than HVT: RUSHA (12.75) vs HVT (9.88). HVT YTD gains are higher at: -5.507 vs. RUSHA (-6.298). RUSHA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 737M vs. HVT (85.9M). RUSHA has more cash in the bank: 184M vs. HVT (121M). HVT has less debt than RUSHA: HVT (218M) vs RUSHA (1.81B). RUSHA has higher revenues than HVT: RUSHA (7.93B) vs HVT (862M).
HVTRUSHAHVT / RUSHA
Capitalization552M4.12B13%
EBITDA85.9M737M12%
Gain YTD-5.507-6.29887%
P/E Ratio9.8812.7577%
Revenue862M7.93B11%
Total Cash121M184M66%
Total Debt218M1.81B12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HVT vs RUSHA: Fundamental Ratings
HVT
RUSHA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1738
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6817
SMR RATING
1..100
7956
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6052
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1119
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HVT's Valuation (9) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (24) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that HVT’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HVT (68) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than HVT’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's SMR Rating (56) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as HVT (79) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to HVT’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as HVT (60) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to HVT’s over the last 12 months.

HVT's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (19) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that HVT’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HVTRUSHA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HVT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OANGX36.150.39
+1.09%
Oakmark Global Institutional
MFVZX17.270.08
+0.47%
MassMutual Equity Opports I
RNWFX89.110.20
+0.22%
American Funds New World R5
EVDAX20.88-0.02
-0.10%
Camelot Event Driven A
RPTTX50.26-0.11
-0.22%
T. Rowe Price Diversified Mid Cap Gr I

HVT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HVT has been loosely correlated with PAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HVT jumps, then PAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HVT
1D Price
Change %
HVT100%
-0.44%
PAG - HVT
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
HZO - HVT
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.03%
RUSHA - HVT
56%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GPI - HVT
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.19%
AN - HVT
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
More

RUSHA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUSHA
1D Price
Change %
RUSHA100%
N/A
RUSHB - RUSHA
87%
Closely correlated
+2.05%
ABG - RUSHA
69%
Closely correlated
N/A
AN - RUSHA
67%
Closely correlated
-0.54%
PAG - RUSHA
67%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
GPI - RUSHA
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.19%
More