HVT
Price
$21.10
Change
-$0.04 (-0.19%)
Updated
Aug 11, 03:28 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
346.14M
79 days until earnings call
RUSHA
Price
$55.16
Change
-$0.04 (-0.07%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
4.29B
78 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HVT vs RUSHA

Header iconHVT vs RUSHA Comparison
Open Charts HVT vs RUSHABanner chart's image
Haverty Furniture Companies
Price$21.10
Change-$0.04 (-0.19%)
Volume$200
Capitalization346.14M
Rush Enterprises
Price$55.16
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
Volume$224.27K
Capitalization4.29B
HVT vs RUSHA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HVT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HVT vs. RUSHA commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HVT is a Hold and RUSHA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (HVT: $21.14 vs. RUSHA: $55.16)
Brand notoriety: HVT and RUSHA are both not notable
HVT represents the Home Improvement Chains, while RUSHA is part of the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HVT: 118% vs. RUSHA: 51%
Market capitalization -- HVT: $346.14M vs. RUSHA: $4.29B
HVT [@Home Improvement Chains] is valued at $346.14M. RUSHA’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $4.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Home Improvement Chains] industry ranges from $385.88B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $47.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Home Improvement Chains] industry is $42.64B. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $3.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HVT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HVT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RUSHA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHA is a better buy in the long-term than HVT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HVT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HVT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RUSHA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHA is a better buy in the short-term than HVT.

Price Growth

HVT (@Home Improvement Chains) experienced а +3.78% price change this week, while RUSHA (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was +3.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Improvement Chains industry was +0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.56%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

HVT is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Home Improvement Chains (+0.03% weekly)

The home improvement chains industry sells home improvement merchandise and do-it-yourself repair and building goods. Customers include individual contractors or construction managers on one hand; on the other hand, there are retail consumers who’d either buy raw materials/items from the store to do a project on their own, or pay extra for installation services. Products sold include fencing supplies, lumber materials, hardware, lighting fixtures, plumbing supplies, home decor items, bathroom remodel items, roofing materials, tools and wallboard to name a few. The Home Depot Inc., Lowe’s Companies, Inc. and Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. are some of the biggest home improvement retailing companies in the U.S. Allowing all types of customers the flexibility to choose or buy products both offline and online and then having the products shipped to the respective sites/homes are some of the potential drivers of a home improvement chain’s popularity. Many big-box home improvement chains are looking to expand their overseas presence. Supply-chain efficiency and distribution management are some of the key ingredients to grow/make profit in this industry.

@Automotive Aftermarket (+1.14% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RUSHA($4.29B) has a higher market cap than HVT($346M). HVT has higher P/E ratio than RUSHA: HVT (18.10) vs RUSHA (15.72). RUSHA YTD gains are higher at: 1.365 vs. HVT (-2.127). RUSHA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 691M vs. HVT (44.6M). RUSHA has more cash in the bank: 229M vs. HVT (112M). HVT has less debt than RUSHA: HVT (218M) vs RUSHA (1.73B). RUSHA has higher revenues than HVT: RUSHA (7.78B) vs HVT (720M).
HVTRUSHAHVT / RUSHA
Capitalization346M4.29B8%
EBITDA44.6M691M6%
Gain YTD-2.1271.365-156%
P/E Ratio18.1015.72115%
Revenue720M7.78B9%
Total Cash112M229M49%
Total Debt218M1.73B13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HVT vs RUSHA: Fundamental Ratings
HVT
RUSHA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6316
SMR RATING
1..100
7957
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5851
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1634
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a15

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HVT's Valuation (9) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (36) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that HVT’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HVT (63) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than HVT’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's SMR Rating (57) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as HVT (79) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to HVT’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as HVT (58) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to HVT’s over the last 12 months.

HVT's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (34) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that HVT’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HVTRUSHA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HVT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCPCF0.26N/A
+1.39%
SCOPE TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
LGYV2.50N/A
N/A
Legacy Ventures International Inc.
SHKLY144.35N/A
N/A
Sinotruk Hong Kong Ltd.
OKCTF27.88N/A
N/A
Okinawa Cellular Telephone Co., Ltd.
DTEGY34.37-0.44
-1.28%
Deutsche Telekom AG

HVT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HVT has been loosely correlated with FND. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HVT jumps, then FND could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HVT
1D Price
Change %
HVT100%
-0.61%
FND - HVT
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
HZO - HVT
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.56%
RUSHA - HVT
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
PAG - HVT
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
RH - HVT
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
More

RUSHA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUSHA
1D Price
Change %
RUSHA100%
-0.07%
RUSHB - RUSHA
85%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
AN - RUSHA
71%
Closely correlated
+0.92%
ABG - RUSHA
67%
Closely correlated
-0.76%
GPI - RUSHA
67%
Closely correlated
+1.53%
PAG - RUSHA
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
More