HVLM
Price
$27.50
Change
+$0.50 (+1.85%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
11.23M
MBCN
Price
$31.50
Change
-$0.50 (-1.56%)
Updated
Jul 7, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
192.69M
22 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HVLM vs MBCN

Header iconHVLM vs MBCN Comparison
Open Charts HVLM vs MBCNBanner chart's image
Huron Valley Ban
Price$27.50
Change+$0.50 (+1.85%)
Volume$300
Capitalization11.23M
Middlefield Banc
Price$31.50
Change-$0.50 (-1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization192.69M
HVLM vs MBCN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HVLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBCN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HVLM vs. MBCN commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HVLM is a Hold and MBCN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (HVLM: $27.50 vs. MBCN: $32.00)
Brand notoriety: HVLM and MBCN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HVLM: 39% vs. MBCN: 45%
Market capitalization -- HVLM: $11.23M vs. MBCN: $192.69M
HVLM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $11.23M. MBCN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $192.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HVLM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMBCN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HVLM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MBCN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBCN is a better buy in the long-term than HVLM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HVLM’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBCN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HVLM’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • MBCN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBCN is a better buy in the short-term than HVLM.

Price Growth

HVLM (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.85% price change this week, while MBCN (@Regional Banks) price change was +6.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

MBCN is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBCN($193M) has a higher market cap than HVLM($11.2M). MBCN YTD gains are higher at: 15.845 vs. HVLM (3.383).
HVLMMBCNHVLM / MBCN
Capitalization11.2M193M6%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.38315.84521%
P/E RatioN/A11.34-
RevenueN/A71.9M-
Total CashN/A56.2M-
Total DebtN/A175M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HVLM vs MBCN: Fundamental Ratings
HVLM
MBCN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10042
SMR RATING
1..100
10046
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5643
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9020
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a44

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HVLM's Valuation (47) in the null industry is in the same range as MBCN (70) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HVLM’s stock grew similarly to MBCN’s over the last 12 months.

MBCN's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HVLM (100) in the null industry. This means that MBCN’s stock grew somewhat faster than HVLM’s over the last 12 months.

MBCN's SMR Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HVLM (100) in the null industry. This means that MBCN’s stock grew somewhat faster than HVLM’s over the last 12 months.

MBCN's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HVLM (56) in the null industry. This means that MBCN’s stock grew similarly to HVLM’s over the last 12 months.

MBCN's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for HVLM (90) in the null industry. This means that MBCN’s stock grew significantly faster than HVLM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HVLMMBCN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
4%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HVLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBCN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ITMSF1.640.03
+1.74%
Intermap Technologies Corp.
ACAT0.05N/A
N/A
Acasia Technology Inc
CNPWM34.25N/A
N/A
Connecticut Light & Power Co. (The)
BOWFF51.12-0.13
-0.25%
Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust
HALFF144.50-0.50
-0.34%
Hal Trust

HVLM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HVLM and BPXXY have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HVLM and BPXXY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HVLM
1D Price
Change %
HVLM100%
N/A
BPXXY - HVLM
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QNBC - HVLM
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCNCA - HVLM
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.71%
MBCN - HVLM
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.76%
FBNC - HVLM
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
More

MBCN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBCN has been loosely correlated with AROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBCN jumps, then AROW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBCN
1D Price
Change %
MBCN100%
+3.76%
AROW - MBCN
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.30%
SBCF - MBCN
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
PFIS - MBCN
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.50%
PRK - MBCN
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
FCBC - MBCN
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.93%
More