HVGDF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
7.75M
IEGCF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
27.89M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HVGDF vs IEGCF

Header iconHVGDF vs IEGCF Comparison
Open Charts HVGDF vs IEGCFBanner chart's image
Harvest Gold
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$121.57K
Capitalization7.75M
Independence Gold
Price$0.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$419.44K
Capitalization27.89M
HVGDF vs IEGCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HVGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IEGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HVGDF vs. IEGCF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HVGDF is a Hold and IEGCF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (HVGDF: $0.07 vs. IEGCF: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: HVGDF and IEGCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HVGDF: 207% vs. IEGCF: 108%
Market capitalization -- HVGDF: $7.75M vs. IEGCF: $27.89M
HVGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $7.75M. IEGCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $27.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $102.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HVGDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIEGCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HVGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IEGCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IEGCF is a better buy in the long-term than HVGDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HVGDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IEGCF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HVGDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • IEGCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IEGCF is a better buy in the short-term than HVGDF.

Price Growth

HVGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -13.75% price change this week, while IEGCF (@Precious Metals) price change was -2.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +32.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6013.73%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.02% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IEGCF($27.9M) has a higher market cap than HVGDF($7.75M). HVGDF YTD gains are higher at: 245.000 vs. IEGCF (-9.481). HVGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.84M vs. IEGCF (-6.55M). IEGCF has more cash in the bank: 5.35M vs. HVGDF (193K). HVGDF (0) and IEGCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
HVGDFIEGCFHVGDF / IEGCF
Capitalization7.75M27.9M28%
EBITDA-2.84M-6.55M43%
Gain YTD245.000-9.481-2,584%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash193K5.35M4%
Total DebtN/A199K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HVGDF vs IEGCF: Fundamental Ratings
HVGDF
IEGCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10083
SMR RATING
1..100
9999
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3650
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IEGCF's Valuation (49) in the null industry is in the same range as HVGDF (68). This means that IEGCF’s stock grew similarly to HVGDF’s over the last 12 months.

IEGCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as HVGDF (100). This means that IEGCF’s stock grew similarly to HVGDF’s over the last 12 months.

IEGCF's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as HVGDF (99). This means that IEGCF’s stock grew similarly to HVGDF’s over the last 12 months.

HVGDF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as IEGCF (50). This means that HVGDF’s stock grew similarly to IEGCF’s over the last 12 months.

HVGDF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as IEGCF (100). This means that HVGDF’s stock grew similarly to IEGCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HVGDFIEGCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HVGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IEGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LZB34.810.86
+2.53%
La-Z-Boy
IDA129.762.14
+1.68%
IDACORP
RNGR14.480.22
+1.54%
Ranger Energy Services
BHM11.43N/A
-0.03%
Bluerock Homes Trust
BABA171.91-3.56
-2.03%
Alibaba Group Holding Limited

HVGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HVGDF and IEGCF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HVGDF and IEGCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HVGDF
1D Price
Change %
HVGDF100%
-5.87%
IEGCF - HVGDF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.97%
HGMCF - HVGDF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A

IEGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IEGCF and AUMBF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IEGCF and AUMBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IEGCF
1D Price
Change %
IEGCF100%
+1.97%
AUMBF - IEGCF
27%
Poorly correlated
+3.29%
EDVMF - IEGCF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
MMRGF - IEGCF
25%
Poorly correlated
+7.09%
FDMIF - IEGCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.86%
JAGGF - IEGCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
More