HVGDF
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.46M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IEGCF
Price
$0.08
Change
+$0.01 (+14.29%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
17.69M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HVGDF vs IEGCF

Header iconHVGDF vs IEGCF Comparison
Open Charts HVGDF vs IEGCFBanner chart's image
Harvest Gold
Price$0.04
Change+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Volume$205K
Capitalization4.46M
Independence Gold
Price$0.08
Change+$0.01 (+14.29%)
Volume$609.24K
Capitalization17.69M
HVGDF vs IEGCF Comparison Chart in %
HVGDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IEGCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HVGDF vs. IEGCF commentary
Dec 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HVGDF is a Hold and IEGCF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 05, 2025
Stock price -- (HVGDF: $0.05 vs. IEGCF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: HVGDF and IEGCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HVGDF: 242% vs. IEGCF: 108%
Market capitalization -- HVGDF: $4.46M vs. IEGCF: $17.69M
HVGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $4.46M. IEGCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $17.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $112.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HVGDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIEGCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HVGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IEGCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IEGCF is a better buy in the long-term than HVGDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HVGDF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IEGCF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HVGDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • IEGCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IEGCF is a better buy in the short-term than HVGDF.

Price Growth

HVGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +2.27% price change this week, while IEGCF (@Precious Metals) price change was +3.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +63.31%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.15% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IEGCF($17.7M) has a higher market cap than HVGDF($4.46M). HVGDF YTD gains are higher at: 125.000 vs. IEGCF (-41.259). HVGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.84M vs. IEGCF (-6.55M). IEGCF has more cash in the bank: 5.35M vs. HVGDF (193K). HVGDF (0) and IEGCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
HVGDFIEGCFHVGDF / IEGCF
Capitalization4.46M17.7M25%
EBITDA-2.84M-6.55M43%
Gain YTD125.000-41.259-303%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash193K5.35M4%
Total DebtN/A199K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HVGDF vs IEGCF: Fundamental Ratings
HVGDF
IEGCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
693
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9998
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6389
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IEGCF's Valuation (43) in the null industry is in the same range as HVGDF (63). This means that IEGCF’s stock grew similarly to HVGDF’s over the last 12 months.

IEGCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HVGDF (100). This means that IEGCF’s stock grew similarly to HVGDF’s over the last 12 months.

IEGCF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as HVGDF (99). This means that IEGCF’s stock grew similarly to HVGDF’s over the last 12 months.

HVGDF's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as IEGCF (89). This means that HVGDF’s stock grew similarly to IEGCF’s over the last 12 months.

HVGDF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as IEGCF (100). This means that HVGDF’s stock grew similarly to IEGCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HVGDFIEGCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HVGDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IEGCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LRMR3.470.35
+11.22%
Larimar Therapeutics
COUR8.360.16
+1.95%
Coursera
CSCO77.750.88
+1.14%
Cisco Systems
CDTX220.981.09
+0.50%
Cidara Therapeutics
DSY0.42-0.02
-5.03%
Big Tree Cloud Holdings Limited

HVGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HVGDF and CRCUF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HVGDF and CRCUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HVGDF
1D Price
Change %
HVGDF100%
+5.88%
CRCUF - HVGDF
29%
Poorly correlated
+7.62%
HGMCF - HVGDF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IRVRF - HVGDF
6%
Poorly correlated
+7.40%
IEGCF - HVGDF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+12.01%

IEGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEGCF has been loosely correlated with DRD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IEGCF jumps, then DRD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IEGCF
1D Price
Change %
IEGCF100%
+12.01%
DRD - IEGCF
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.45%
SA - IEGCF
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.03%
NFGC - IEGCF
34%
Loosely correlated
+5.67%
IAG - IEGCF
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
PAAS - IEGCF
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
More