HUT
Price
$25.38
Change
-$0.23 (-0.90%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.68B
WULF
Price
$9.13
Change
+$0.26 (+2.93%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
3.58B
71 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HUT vs WULF

Header iconHUT vs WULF Comparison
Open Charts HUT vs WULFBanner chart's image
Hut 8
Price$25.38
Change-$0.23 (-0.90%)
Volume$5.26M
Capitalization2.68B
TeraWulf
Price$9.13
Change+$0.26 (+2.93%)
Volume$26.97M
Capitalization3.58B
HUT vs WULF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HUT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WULF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HUT vs. WULF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUT is a Hold and WULF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (HUT: $25.38 vs. WULF: $9.13)
Brand notoriety: HUT and WULF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HUT: 104% vs. WULF: 49%
Market capitalization -- HUT: $2.68B vs. WULF: $3.58B
HUT [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $2.68B. WULF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $3.58B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HUT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWULF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HUT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WULF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HUT is a better buy in the long-term than WULF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HUT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WULF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HUT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WULF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both HUT and WULF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

HUT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -5.05% price change this week, while WULF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -3.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

WULF is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.73% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WULF($3.58B) has a higher market cap than HUT($2.68B). WULF YTD gains are higher at: 61.307 vs. HUT (23.865). HUT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 367M vs. WULF (-72.9M). HUT has more cash in the bank: 216M vs. WULF (90M). HUT has less debt than WULF: HUT (362M) vs WULF (501M). HUT has higher revenues than WULF: HUT (550M) vs WULF (144M).
HUTWULFHUT / WULF
Capitalization2.68B3.58B75%
EBITDA367M-72.9M-503%
Gain YTD23.86561.30739%
P/E Ratio17.75N/A-
Revenue550M144M382%
Total Cash216M90M240%
Total Debt362M501M72%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HUT vs WULF: Fundamental Ratings
HUT
WULF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4391
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7887
SMR RATING
1..100
5498
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3635
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2150

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HUT's Valuation (82) in the null industry is in the same range as WULF (83). This means that HUT’s stock grew similarly to WULF’s over the last 12 months.

HUT's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as WULF (87). This means that HUT’s stock grew similarly to WULF’s over the last 12 months.

HUT's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WULF (98). This means that HUT’s stock grew somewhat faster than WULF’s over the last 12 months.

WULF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as HUT (36). This means that WULF’s stock grew similarly to HUT’s over the last 12 months.

HUT's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WULF (100). This means that HUT’s stock grew significantly faster than WULF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HUTWULF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HUT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WULF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CCASX73.090.63
+0.87%
Conestoga Small Cap Investors
VCSLX16.880.08
+0.48%
VALIC Company I Small Cap Index
LRSFX15.74N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value F
ETAEX13.72N/A
N/A
Eventide Exponential Technologies A
MFEHX195.66-1.50
-0.76%
MFS Growth R3

HUT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUT has been closely correlated with RIOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUT jumps, then RIOT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUT
1D Price
Change %
HUT100%
-0.90%
RIOT - HUT
80%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
HIVE - HUT
79%
Closely correlated
-1.85%
CIFR - HUT
78%
Closely correlated
+1.62%
IREN - HUT
78%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
BITF - HUT
77%
Closely correlated
+3.20%
More

WULF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WULF has been closely correlated with HUT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WULF jumps, then HUT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WULF
1D Price
Change %
WULF100%
+2.93%
HUT - WULF
76%
Closely correlated
-0.90%
IREN - WULF
76%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
CIFR - WULF
74%
Closely correlated
+1.62%
BITF - WULF
73%
Closely correlated
+3.20%
RIOT - WULF
72%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
More