HUT
Price
$20.38
Change
-$0.76 (-3.60%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
985.18M
PNPFF
Price
$11.20
Change
-$0.68 (-5.72%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
27.26M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HUT vs PNPFF

Header iconHUT vs PNPFF Comparison
Open Charts HUT vs PNPFFBanner chart's image
Hut 8
Price$20.38
Change-$0.76 (-3.60%)
Volume$3.41M
Capitalization985.18M
Pinetree Capital
Price$11.20
Change-$0.68 (-5.72%)
Volume$356
Capitalization27.26M
HUT vs PNPFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HUT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNPFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HUT vs. PNPFF commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUT is a Hold and PNPFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (HUT: $20.38 vs. PNPFF: $11.20)
Brand notoriety: HUT and PNPFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HUT: 58% vs. PNPFF: 27%
Market capitalization -- HUT: $985.18M vs. PNPFF: $27.26M
HUT [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $985.18M. PNPFF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $27.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HUT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePNPFF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HUT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PNPFF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PNPFF is a better buy in the long-term than HUT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HUT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNPFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HUT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PNPFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HUT is a better buy in the short-term than PNPFF.

Price Growth

HUT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -5.74% price change this week, while PNPFF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -6.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -2.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.79%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-2.06% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUT($985M) has a higher market cap than PNPFF($27.3M). HUT has higher P/E ratio than PNPFF: HUT (12.84) vs PNPFF (11.10). PNPFF YTD gains are higher at: 46.597 vs. HUT (-0.537). PNPFF has less debt than HUT: PNPFF (6.69M) vs HUT (79.5M). HUT has higher revenues than PNPFF: HUT (77M) vs PNPFF (4.23M).
HUTPNPFFHUT / PNPFF
Capitalization985M27.3M3,608%
EBITDA-80.09MN/A-
Gain YTD-0.53746.597-1%
P/E Ratio12.8411.10116%
Revenue77M4.23M1,819%
Total Cash21.1MN/A-
Total Debt79.5M6.69M1,189%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HUT vs PNPFF: Fundamental Ratings
HUT
PNPFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1850
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8022
SMR RATING
1..100
9321
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4244
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7322
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PNPFF's Valuation (69) in the null industry is in the same range as HUT (74). This means that PNPFF’s stock grew similarly to HUT’s over the last 12 months.

PNPFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUT (80). This means that PNPFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUT’s over the last 12 months.

PNPFF's SMR Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HUT (93). This means that PNPFF’s stock grew significantly faster than HUT’s over the last 12 months.

HUT's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as PNPFF (44). This means that HUT’s stock grew similarly to PNPFF’s over the last 12 months.

PNPFF's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUT (73). This means that PNPFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HUTPNPFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HUT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNPFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WEIMX17.560.12
+0.69%
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites I
BDFUX35.300.23
+0.66%
Baron Discovery R6
NLSCX18.460.02
+0.11%
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
SEEFX21.19-0.01
-0.05%
Saturna Sustainable Equity
TEMUX15.79-0.07
-0.44%
Morgan Stanley Pathway Em Mkts Eq

HUT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUT has been closely correlated with HIVE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUT jumps, then HIVE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUT
1D Price
Change %
HUT100%
-3.60%
HIVE - HUT
80%
Closely correlated
-5.42%
RIOT - HUT
80%
Closely correlated
-1.02%
IREN - HUT
79%
Closely correlated
-2.32%
CIFR - HUT
77%
Closely correlated
-3.14%
WULF - HUT
76%
Closely correlated
-2.82%
More

PNPFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PNPFF and BMNR have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PNPFF and BMNR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNPFF
1D Price
Change %
PNPFF100%
-5.72%
BMNR - PNPFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.67%
HUT - PNPFF
8%
Poorly correlated
-3.60%
HOOD - PNPFF
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.86%
MNXBF - PNPFF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COIN - PNPFF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.27%
More