It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HUSQF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMMNNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HUSQF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMNNF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
HUSQF (@Tools & Hardware) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MMNNF (@Industrial Specialties) price change was +16.19% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tools & Hardware industry was +1.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.13%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Specialties industry was -0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.26%.
Tools & Hardware industry includes companies that manufacture security products, storage cabinets, steel rules and tapes, calipers, shoe hook fasteners, lumber, structural materials and other related supplies. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., Snap-on Incorporated and L.S. Starrett Company are some of the largest, established players in this industry. The industry is also seeing rapid growth in online sales. The proliferation of do-it-yourself (DIY) projects has boosted industry demand. But oil price volatility poses potential risks to this industry, particularly to e-commerce companies which spend on services of shipping companies, which might alter charges based on oil price movements.
@Industrial Specialties (-0.68% weekly)Companies in the industrial specialties industry process basic materials and minerals into various specialty products, such as flat and safety glass, fire retardant products, paints and coatings. Examples of companies operating in this industry are Sherwin-Williams Company, PPG Industries, Inc. and RPM International Inc.
HUSQF | MMNNF | HUSQF / MMNNF | |
Capitalization | 3.35B | 2.67B | 125% |
EBITDA | 2.41B | 2.41B | 100% |
Gain YTD | 4.423 | -6.197 | -71% |
P/E Ratio | 23.23 | 35.54 | 65% |
Revenue | 48.2B | 16.4B | 294% |
Total Cash | 3.48B | 1.65B | 211% |
Total Debt | 14B | 8.2B | 171% |
HUSQF | MMNNF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 97 | 97 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | 55 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 34 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 84 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 49 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HUSQF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MMNNF (55). This means that HUSQF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MMNNF’s over the last 12 months.
MMNNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HUSQF (100). This means that MMNNF’s stock grew significantly faster than HUSQF’s over the last 12 months.
MMNNF's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as HUSQF (84). This means that MMNNF’s stock grew similarly to HUSQF’s over the last 12 months.
MMNNF's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as HUSQF (58). This means that MMNNF’s stock grew similarly to HUSQF’s over the last 12 months.
HUSQF's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as MMNNF (76). This means that HUSQF’s stock grew similarly to MMNNF’s over the last 12 months.
HUSQF | MMNNF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago42% | 3 days ago38% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago28% | 3 days ago38% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago40% | 3 days ago33% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago52% | 3 days ago33% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago32% | 3 days ago18% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago24% | 3 days ago14% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago25% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago69% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that HUSQF and MMNNF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HUSQF and MMNNF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUSQF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HUSQF | 100% | N/A | ||
MMNNF - HUSQF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
IMIAF - HUSQF | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
JPSWY - HUSQF | 6% Poorly correlated | +3.77% | ||
ITMPF - HUSQF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
IHICY - HUSQF | 3% Poorly correlated | -1.58% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMNNF has been loosely correlated with GWTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MMNNF jumps, then GWTR could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MMNNF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MMNNF | 100% | N/A | ||
GWTR - MMNNF | 41% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
HUSQF - MMNNF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
NLLSY - MMNNF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
MCRUF - MMNNF | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
MLSPF - MMNNF | 5% Poorly correlated | +3.50% | ||
More |