HUSQF
Price
$5.30
Change
+$0.03 (+0.57%)
Updated
May 29 closing price
Capitalization
5.6B
ITMPF
Price
$1.24
Change
+$0.09 (+7.83%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
733.17M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HUSQF vs ITMPF

Header iconHUSQF vs ITMPF Comparison
Open Charts HUSQF vs ITMPFBanner chart's image
Husqvarna AB
Price$5.30
Change+$0.03 (+0.57%)
Volume$200
Capitalization5.6B
ITM Power
Price$1.24
Change+$0.09 (+7.83%)
Volume$2.82K
Capitalization733.17M
HUSQF vs ITMPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HUSQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ITMPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HUSQF vs. ITMPF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUSQF is a Hold and ITMPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (HUSQF: $5.30 vs. ITMPF: $1.24)
Brand notoriety: HUSQF and ITMPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HUSQF: 18% vs. ITMPF: 30%
Market capitalization -- HUSQF: $5.6B vs. ITMPF: $733.17M
HUSQF [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $5.6B. ITMPF’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $733.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $135.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $9.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HUSQF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileITMPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HUSQF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ITMPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HUSQF is a better buy in the long-term than ITMPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HUSQF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ITMPF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HUSQF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • ITMPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HUSQF is a better buy in the short-term than ITMPF.

Price Growth

HUSQF (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ITMPF (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +16.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +1.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.70%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (+1.38% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUSQF($5.6B) has a higher market cap than ITMPF($733M). ITMPF YTD gains are higher at: 186.806 vs. HUSQF (1.923). HUSQF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.26B vs. ITMPF (-27.52M). HUSQF has more cash in the bank: 3.99B vs. ITMPF (164M). ITMPF has less debt than HUSQF: ITMPF (6.55M) vs HUSQF (16.7B). HUSQF has higher revenues than ITMPF: HUSQF (56.7B) vs ITMPF (8.25M).
HUSQFITMPFHUSQF / ITMPF
Capitalization5.6B733M765%
EBITDA3.26B-27.52M-11,857%
Gain YTD1.923186.8061%
P/E Ratio30.30N/A-
Revenue56.7B8.25M687,023%
Total Cash3.99B164M2,433%
Total Debt16.7B6.55M255,157%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HUSQF vs ITMPF: Fundamental Ratings
HUSQF
ITMPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8493
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6234
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
43100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HUSQF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ITMPF (54). This means that HUSQF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ITMPF’s over the last 12 months.

HUSQF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as ITMPF (100). This means that HUSQF’s stock grew similarly to ITMPF’s over the last 12 months.

HUSQF's SMR Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as ITMPF (93). This means that HUSQF’s stock grew similarly to ITMPF’s over the last 12 months.

ITMPF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as HUSQF (62). This means that ITMPF’s stock grew similarly to HUSQF’s over the last 12 months.

HUSQF's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ITMPF (100). This means that HUSQF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ITMPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HUSQFITMPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HUSQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ITMPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSPU71.230.54
+0.76%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Utilts ETF
BKSE102.780.66
+0.64%
BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF
DEM46.160.23
+0.50%
WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Div ETF
MEXX18.360.07
+0.38%
Direxion Dly MSCI Mexico Bull 3X ShsETF
CCZ62.95N/A
N/A
Comcast Holdings Corp

HUSQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HUSQF and MMNNF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HUSQF and MMNNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUSQF
1D Price
Change %
HUSQF100%
N/A
MMNNF - HUSQF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IMIAF - HUSQF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JPSWY - HUSQF
6%
Poorly correlated
-10.95%
ITMPF - HUSQF
3%
Poorly correlated
+7.74%
IHICY - HUSQF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
More

ITMPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ITMPF and TPIC have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ITMPF and TPIC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ITMPF
1D Price
Change %
ITMPF100%
+7.74%
TPIC - ITMPF
20%
Poorly correlated
+9.21%
KNYJF - ITMPF
17%
Poorly correlated
+3.01%
HUQVF - ITMPF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IMIAF - ITMPF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KMRCF - ITMPF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More