Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HUMEX vs SSGSX
HUMEX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HUMEX vs SSGSX
Huber Mid Cap Value Instl
Price$17.29
Change+$0.44 (+2.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.29M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.21
Change+$0.63 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.18B
HUMEX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HUMEX vs. SSGSX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUMEX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.18B vs. HUMEX (11.3M). HUMEX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HUMEX (1.17) vs SSGSX (0.48). HUMEX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HUMEX (10 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). HUMEX (2.10) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). HUMEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.23 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HUMEX: SSGSX (2500) vs HUMEX (1000000). HUMEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.94 vs. SSGSX (-13.68). HUMEX return over 5 years is better than : 49.85 vs. SSGSX (4.92).
| HUMEX | SSGSX | HUMEX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.26 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.26 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.267 | 0.582 | 218% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3M | 5.18B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.48 | 247% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.94 | -13.68 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.68 | -7.65 | -218% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.85 | 4.92 | 1,013% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 17.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement