Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HUMEX vs SSGSX
HUMEX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HUMEX vs SSGSX
Huber Mid Cap Value Instl
Price$16.90
Change+$0.15 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.61M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.38
Change+$0.08 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
HUMEX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HUMEX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUMEX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. HUMEX (12.6M). HUMEX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HUMEX (1.17) vs SSGSX (0.47). HUMEX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HUMEX (10 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). HUMEX (2.10) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). HUMEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.23 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HUMEX: SSGSX (2500) vs HUMEX (1000000). HUMEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.90 vs. SSGSX (-1.56). HUMEX return over 5 years is better than : 78.92 vs. SSGSX (22.95).
| HUMEX | SSGSX | HUMEX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.26 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.26 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.569 | 2.046 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.6M | 5.64B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.47 | 247% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.90 | -1.56 | -507% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.59 | 3.97 | 443% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.92 | 22.95 | 344% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 24.71 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement