Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HUMEX vs SSGSX
HUMEX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HUMEX vs SSGSX
Huber Mid Cap Value Instl
Price$17.97
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.7M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.64
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.12B
HUMEX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HUMEX vs. SSGSX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUMEX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.12B vs. HUMEX (11.7M). HUMEX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HUMEX (1.17) vs SSGSX (0.48). HUMEX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HUMEX (10 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). HUMEX (2.10) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.23). HUMEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.23 vs. SSGSX (50.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HUMEX: SSGSX (2500) vs HUMEX (1000000). HUMEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.73 vs. SSGSX (-2.93). HUMEX return over 5 years is better than : 58.86 vs. SSGSX (-0.61).
| HUMEX | SSGSX | HUMEX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.23 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.23 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.449 | -1.701 | -497% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7M | 5.12B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.48 | 247% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.73 | -2.93 | -264% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.24 | 0.24 | 15,367% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.86 | -0.61 | -9,605% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 28.96 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement