Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HUMEX vs SSGSX
HUMEX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HUMEX vs SSGSX
Huber Mid Cap Value Instl
Price$16.57
Change-$0.18 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.82M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.80
Change-$0.57 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.23B
HUMEX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HUMEX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUMEX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.23B vs. HUMEX (10.8M). HUMEX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HUMEX (1.19) vs SSGSX (0.49). HUMEX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HUMEX (10 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). HUMEX (2.10) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). HUMEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.23 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HUMEX: SSGSX (2500) vs HUMEX (1000000). HUMEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.82 vs. SSGSX (-12.62). HUMEX return over 5 years is better than : 64.34 vs. SSGSX (8.71).
| HUMEX | SSGSX | HUMEX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.26 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.26 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.086 | -0.129 | -841% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8M | 5.23B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 0.49 | 245% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.82 | -12.62 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.16 | -6.25 | -258% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.34 | 8.71 | 738% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 20.45 | - |