Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HUMDX vs SSGSX
HUMDX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HUMDX vs SSGSX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.06
Change-$2.54 (-5.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.29B
HUMDX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HUMDX vs. SSGSX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUMDX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.29B vs. HUMDX (11.6M). HUMDX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HUMDX (1.01) vs SSGSX (0.48). HUMDX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HUMDX (10 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). HUMDX (2.40) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.23). HUMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.23 vs. SSGSX (50.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HUMDX: SSGSX (2500) vs HUMDX (5000). HUMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.62 vs. SSGSX (-8.83). HUMDX return over 5 years is better than : 59.48 vs. SSGSX (6.40).
| HUMDX | SSGSX | HUMDX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 1.23 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.40 | 1.23 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.674 | 4.674 | 164% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.6M | 5.29B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 0.48 | 212% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.62 | -8.83 | -41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.07 | -1.03 | -2,812% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.48 | 6.40 | 929% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 29.48 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement