Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HUMDX vs SSGSX
HUMDX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HUMDX vs SSGSX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.05
Change+$0.29 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.04B
HUMDX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HUMDX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUMDX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.04B vs. HUMDX (12.1M). HUMDX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HUMDX (0.76) vs SSGSX (0.61). HUMDX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HUMDX (10 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). HUMDX (2.40) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.23). HUMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.23 vs. SSGSX (50.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HUMDX: SSGSX (2500) vs HUMDX (5000). HUMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.21 vs. SSGSX (2.79). HUMDX return over 5 years is better than : 47.08 vs. SSGSX (-4.85).
| HUMDX | SSGSX | HUMDX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 1.23 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.40 | 1.23 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.808 | 4.632 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1M | 5.04B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.61 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.21 | 2.79 | 438% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.67 | -1.97 | -1,760% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.08 | -4.85 | -970% |
| Returns for 10 years | 126.51 | 49.63 | 255% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers