Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HUMDX vs SSGSX
HUMDX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HUMDX vs SSGSX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.80
Change-$0.57 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.23B
HUMDX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HUMDX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUMDX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.23B vs. HUMDX (10.8M). HUMDX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HUMDX (1.02) vs SSGSX (0.49). HUMDX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HUMDX (10 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). HUMDX (2.40) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). HUMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.23 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HUMDX: SSGSX (2500) vs HUMDX (5000). HUMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.77 vs. SSGSX (-12.62). HUMDX return over 5 years is better than : 61.74 vs. SSGSX (8.71).
| HUMDX | SSGSX | HUMDX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 1.26 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.40 | 1.26 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.181 | -0.129 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8M | 5.23B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.49 | 210% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.77 | -12.62 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.80 | -6.25 | -253% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.74 | 8.71 | 708% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 20.45 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement