Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HUMDX vs SSGSX
HUMDX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HUMDX vs SSGSX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.49
Change-$0.48 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.5B
HUMDX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HUMDX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUMDX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.5B vs. HUMDX (12.3M). HUMDX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HUMDX (1.07) vs SSGSX (0.50). HUMDX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HUMDX (10 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). HUMDX (2.40) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). HUMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.23 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HUMDX: SSGSX (2500) vs HUMDX (5000). HUMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.51 vs. SSGSX (-5.53). HUMDX return over 5 years is better than : 65.60 vs. SSGSX (15.88).
| HUMDX | SSGSX | HUMDX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 1.26 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.40 | 1.26 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.900 | -2.025 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.3M | 5.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.50 | 213% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.51 | -5.53 | -64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.82 | -9.76 | -60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.60 | 15.88 | 413% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 15.23 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement