HUM
Price
$254.95
Change
+$0.52 (+0.20%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
30.66B
39 days until earnings call
MOH
Price
$191.98
Change
+$2.68 (+1.42%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
10.41B
25 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HUM vs MOH

Header iconHUM vs MOH Comparison
Open Charts HUM vs MOHBanner chart's image
Humana
Price$254.95
Change+$0.52 (+0.20%)
Volume$1.26M
Capitalization30.66B
Molina Healthcare
Price$191.98
Change+$2.68 (+1.42%)
Volume$1.08M
Capitalization10.41B
HUM vs MOH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HUM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MOH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HUM vs. MOH commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUM is a Buy and MOH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (HUM: $254.95 vs. MOH: $191.98)
Brand notoriety: HUM: Notable vs. MOH: Not notable
Both companies represent the Publishing: Books/Magazines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HUM: 67% vs. MOH: 64%
Market capitalization -- HUM: $30.66B vs. MOH: $10.41B
HUM [@Publishing: Books/Magazines] is valued at $30.66B. MOH’s [@Publishing: Books/Magazines] market capitalization is $10.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Publishing: Books/Magazines] industry ranges from $311.62B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Publishing: Books/Magazines] industry is $44.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HUM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMOH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HUM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MOH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HUM is a better buy in the long-term than MOH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HUM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MOH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HUM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MOH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MOH is a better buy in the short-term than HUM.

Price Growth

HUM (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) experienced а +1.26% price change this week, while MOH (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) price change was +9.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was +2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

HUM is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

MOH is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Publishing: Books/Magazines (+2.16% weekly)

The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUM($30.7B) has a higher market cap than MOH($10.4B). HUM has higher P/E ratio than MOH: HUM (19.54) vs MOH (9.47). HUM YTD gains are higher at: 1.545 vs. MOH (-34.039). MOH has less debt than HUM: MOH (3.56B) vs HUM (12.6B).
HUMMOHHUM / MOH
Capitalization30.7B10.4B295%
EBITDAN/A1.85B-
Gain YTD1.545-34.039-5%
P/E Ratio19.549.47206%
RevenueN/A43.4B-
Total CashN/A8.81B-
Total Debt12.6B3.56B354%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HUM vs MOH: Fundamental Ratings
HUM
MOH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7213
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10096
SMR RATING
1..100
9840
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6365
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6094
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HUM's Valuation (36) in the Managed Health Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MOH (80). This means that HUM’s stock grew somewhat faster than MOH’s over the last 12 months.

MOH's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the Managed Health Care industry is in the same range as HUM (100). This means that MOH’s stock grew similarly to HUM’s over the last 12 months.

MOH's SMR Rating (40) in the Managed Health Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUM (98). This means that MOH’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUM’s over the last 12 months.

HUM's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Managed Health Care industry is in the same range as MOH (65). This means that HUM’s stock grew similarly to MOH’s over the last 12 months.

HUM's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the Managed Health Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MOH (94). This means that HUM’s stock grew somewhat faster than MOH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HUMMOH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HUM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MOH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MXF19.390.37
+1.95%
Mexico Fund
JCTR88.940.55
+0.62%
JPMorgan Carbon Transition US Eq ETF
CPRJ26.410.07
+0.25%
Calamos Russell 2000 Str Alt Prt ETF-Jul
SHAG47.930.03
+0.06%
WisdomTree Yield Enh US S-T Aggt Bd ETF
PXH25.14-0.01
-0.02%
Invesco RAFI Emerging Markets ETF

HUM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUM has been loosely correlated with CVS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HUM jumps, then CVS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUM
1D Price
Change %
HUM100%
+0.55%
CVS - HUM
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.55%
ALHC - HUM
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
ELV - HUM
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
CI - HUM
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
MOH - HUM
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.42%
More

MOH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOH has been closely correlated with CNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MOH jumps, then CNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MOH
1D Price
Change %
MOH100%
+1.42%
CNC - MOH
76%
Closely correlated
+1.37%
ELV - MOH
71%
Closely correlated
+0.60%
OSCR - MOH
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.82%
CI - MOH
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
UNH - MOH
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
More