HUM
Price
$286.39
Change
+$5.05 (+1.79%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
34.44B
79 days until earnings call
IHF
Price
$45.86
Change
+$1.75 (+3.97%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Net Assets
735.89M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HUM vs IHF

Header iconHUM vs IHF Comparison
Open Charts HUM vs IHFBanner chart's image
Humana
Price$286.39
Change+$5.05 (+1.79%)
Volume$1.74M
Capitalization34.44B
iShares US Healthcare Providers ETF
Price$45.86
Change+$1.75 (+3.97%)
Volume$1.45M
Net Assets735.89M
HUM vs IHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HUM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HUM vs. IHF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUM is a Hold and IHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (HUM: $286.39)
Brand notoriety:
Market capitalization --

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HUM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.

  • HUM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HUM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HUM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

HUM (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) experienced а +7.39% price change this weekfor the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was +4.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

HUM is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Publishing: Books/Magazines (+4.43% weekly)

The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HUM: Fundamental Ratings
HUM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
69
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HUMIHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HUM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PMJA25.93N/A
N/A
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - January
BSJU26.03-0.01
-0.06%
Invesco BulletShares 2030 HY Corp Bd ETF
CIF1.75N/A
-0.07%
MFS Intermediate High Income Fund
FVD45.88-0.15
-0.33%
First Trust Value Line® Dividend ETF
UVIX14.25-0.08
-0.56%
2x Long VIX Futures ETF

HUM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUM has been loosely correlated with CVS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HUM jumps, then CVS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUM
1D Price
Change %
HUM100%
+1.79%
CVS - HUM
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.80%
ELV - HUM
45%
Loosely correlated
+4.79%
ALHC - HUM
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.48%
CI - HUM
33%
Poorly correlated
+2.24%
MOH - HUM
28%
Poorly correlated
+4.92%
More

IHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IHF has been closely correlated with ELV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IHF jumps, then ELV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IHF
1D Price
Change %
IHF100%
+3.97%
ELV - IHF
74%
Closely correlated
+4.79%
HUM - IHF
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.79%
MOH - IHF
63%
Loosely correlated
+4.92%
CI - IHF
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.24%
CNC - IHF
57%
Loosely correlated
+5.79%
More