HUBS
Price
$615.26
Change
+$14.76 (+2.46%)
Updated
Apr 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
32.27B
3 days until earnings call
ZM
Price
$76.03
Change
+$0.54 (+0.72%)
Updated
Apr 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
20.11B
29 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HUBS vs ZM

Header iconHUBS vs ZM Comparison
Open Charts HUBS vs ZMBanner chart's image
HUBSPOT
Price$615.26
Change+$14.76 (+2.46%)
Volume$1.91K
Capitalization32.27B
Zoom Communications
Price$76.03
Change+$0.54 (+0.72%)
Volume$24.22K
Capitalization20.11B
HUBS vs ZM Comparison Chart
Loading...
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HUBS vs. ZM commentary
Apr 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUBS is a Hold and ZM is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 27, 2025
Stock price -- (HUBS: $600.50 vs. ZM: $75.49)
Brand notoriety: HUBS: Not notable vs. ZM: Notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HUBS: 99% vs. ZM: 69%
Market capitalization -- HUBS: $32.27B vs. ZM: $20.11B
HUBS [@Packaged Software] is valued at $32.27B. ZM’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $20.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HUBS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ZM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HUBS is a better buy in the long-term than ZM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HUBS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HUBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ZM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ZM is a better buy in the short-term than HUBS.

Price Growth

HUBS (@Packaged Software) experienced а +11.27% price change this week, while ZM (@Packaged Software) price change was +5.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

HUBS is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

ZM is expected to report earnings on May 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+4.57% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUBS($32.3B) has a higher market cap than ZM($20.1B). ZM YTD gains are higher at: -7.499 vs. HUBS (-13.817). ZM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 630M vs. HUBS (-81.23M). ZM has more cash in the bank: 6.96B vs. HUBS (1.39B). ZM has less debt than HUBS: ZM (73M) vs HUBS (788M). ZM has higher revenues than HUBS: ZM (4.53B) vs HUBS (2.17B).
HUBSZMHUBS / ZM
Capitalization32.3B20.1B161%
EBITDA-81.23M630M-13%
Gain YTD-13.817-7.499184%
P/E RatioN/A31.27-
Revenue2.17B4.53B48%
Total Cash1.39B6.96B20%
Total Debt788M73M1,079%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HUBS vs ZM: Fundamental Ratings
HUBS
ZM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6211
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
49100
SMR RATING
1..100
9061
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7956
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8171
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ZM's Valuation (76) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

HUBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZM (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZM’s over the last 12 months.

ZM's SMR Rating (61) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (90) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

ZM's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (79) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

ZM's P/E Growth Rating (71) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (81) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HUBSZM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
83%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
79%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA259.518.77
+3.50%
Tesla
SPY546.6911.27
+2.10%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL208.373.77
+1.84%
Apple
BTC.X93943.800000244.687500
+0.26%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME27.08-0.04
-0.15%
GameStop Corp

HUBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been loosely correlated with NOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then NOW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUBS
1D Price
Change %
HUBS100%
+6.10%
NOW - HUBS
64%
Loosely correlated
+15.49%
SHOP - HUBS
61%
Loosely correlated
+4.57%
TEAM - HUBS
60%
Loosely correlated
+8.07%
BRZE - HUBS
58%
Loosely correlated
+7.02%
NET - HUBS
57%
Loosely correlated
+11.29%
More

ZM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZM has been loosely correlated with RNG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZM jumps, then RNG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZM
1D Price
Change %
ZM100%
+3.65%
RNG - ZM
49%
Loosely correlated
+6.38%
ZS - ZM
49%
Loosely correlated
+4.76%
HUBS - ZM
48%
Loosely correlated
+6.10%
DOCU - ZM
47%
Loosely correlated
+4.69%
DBX - ZM
46%
Loosely correlated
+3.16%
More