Advertisement
HUBS vs ZM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUBS is a Buy and ZM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HUBS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- ZM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HUBS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HUBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- ZM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
HUBS (@Packaged Software) experienced а -9.79% price change this week, while ZM (@Packaged Software) price change was +0.87% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.79%.
Reported Earning Dates
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.
ZM is expected to report earnings on Aug 21, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.63% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| HUBS | ZM | HUBS / ZM | |
| Capitalization | 23.7B | 21.7B | 109% |
| EBITDA | 119M | 983M | 12% |
| Gain YTD | -35.456 | -12.302 | 288% |
| P/E Ratio | 7023.44 | 21.49 | 32,679% |
| Revenue | 2.72B | 4.7B | 58% |
| Total Cash | 2.04B | 7.79B | 26% |
| Total Debt | 655M | 61.5M | 1,065% |
HUBS | ZM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 62 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 46 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 45 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ZM's Valuation (71) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as ZM (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to ZM’s over the last 12 months.
ZM's SMR Rating (62) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (91) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
ZM's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (89) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
ZM's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (77) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
| HUBS | ZM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 80% | 20 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 71% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SPHB | 101.35 | 0.44 | +0.44% |
| Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF | |||
| IWMW | 38.50 | 0.05 | +0.14% |
| iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF | |||
| SCDS | 55.02 | N/A | N/A |
| JPMorgan Fundamental Data Sci Sm Cor ETF | |||
| OWNS | 17.19 | -0.05 | -0.31% |
| CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF | |||
| XAR | 214.39 | -0.93 | -0.43% |
| SPDR® S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | |||
HUBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBS | 100% | -2.63% | ||
| CRM - HUBS | 73% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| TEAM - HUBS | 68% Closely correlated | -1.72% | ||
| NOW - HUBS | 68% Closely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| S - HUBS | 67% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| CRWD - HUBS | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
More | ||||
ZM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZM has been loosely correlated with PATH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZM jumps, then PATH could also see price increases.