HUBS vs ZM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUBS is a Hold and ZM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HUBS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- HUBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ZM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HUBS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HUBS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- ZM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
HUBS (@Packaged Software) experienced а +2.41% price change this week, while ZM (@Packaged Software) price change was +1.65% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.07%.
Reported Earning Dates
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.
ZM is expected to report earnings on May 26, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-2.10% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| HUBS | ZM | HUBS / ZM | |
| Capitalization | 32.3B | 20.1B | 161% |
| EBITDA | -81.23M | 630M | -13% |
| Gain YTD | 15.296 | 4.399 | 348% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 31.27 | - |
| Revenue | 2.17B | 4.53B | 48% |
| Total Cash | 1.39B | 6.96B | 20% |
| Total Debt | 788M | 73M | 1,079% |
HUBS | ZM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 75 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 32 | 96 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 63 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ZM's Valuation (75) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZM (96) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZM’s over the last 12 months.
ZM's SMR Rating (63) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (90) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as ZM (42) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to ZM’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZM (97) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZM’s over the last 12 months.
| HUBS | ZM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 70% | 6 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 66% | 6 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 6 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 65% | 6 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 27 days ago 83% | 27 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 66% | 21 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 79% |
HUBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been loosely correlated with NOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then NOW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBS | 100% | -1.06% | ||
| NOW - HUBS | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.10% | ||
| PD - HUBS | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| FRSH - HUBS | 47% Loosely correlated | +3.23% | ||
| BRZE - HUBS | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| PATH - HUBS | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.20% | ||
More | ||||
ZM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZM has been loosely correlated with RNG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZM jumps, then RNG could also see price increases.