HUBS
Price
$569.82
Change
-$3.75 (-0.65%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
32.27B
47 days until earnings call
SNOW
Price
$211.22
Change
+$2.61 (+1.25%)
Updated
Jun 12, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
53.65B
69 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HUBS vs SNOW

Header iconHUBS vs SNOW Comparison
Open Charts HUBS vs SNOWBanner chart's image
HUBSPOT
Price$569.82
Change-$3.75 (-0.65%)
Volume$1.22M
Capitalization32.27B
Snowflake
Price$211.22
Change+$2.61 (+1.25%)
Volume$31.64K
Capitalization53.65B
HUBS vs SNOW Comparison Chart
Loading...
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNOW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HUBS vs. SNOW commentary
Jun 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUBS is a Buy and SNOW is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 13, 2025
Stock price -- (HUBS: $573.57 vs. SNOW: $208.61)
Brand notoriety: HUBS and SNOW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HUBS: 95% vs. SNOW: 115%
Market capitalization -- HUBS: $32.27B vs. SNOW: $53.65B
HUBS [@Packaged Software] is valued at $32.27B. SNOW’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $53.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HUBS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSNOW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SNOW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SNOW is a better buy in the long-term than HUBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HUBS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNOW’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HUBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SNOW’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HUBS is a better buy in the short-term than SNOW.

Price Growth

HUBS (@Packaged Software) experienced а -4.29% price change this week, while SNOW (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

HUBS is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

SNOW is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.61% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SNOW($53.6B) has a higher market cap than HUBS($32.3B). SNOW YTD gains are higher at: 35.101 vs. HUBS (-18.220). HUBS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -81.23M vs. SNOW (-974.87M). SNOW has more cash in the bank: 3.85B vs. HUBS (1.39B). SNOW has less debt than HUBS: SNOW (288M) vs HUBS (788M). SNOW has higher revenues than HUBS: SNOW (2.81B) vs HUBS (2.17B).
HUBSSNOWHUBS / SNOW
Capitalization32.3B53.6B60%
EBITDA-81.23M-974.87M8%
Gain YTD-18.22035.101-52%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue2.17B2.81B77%
Total Cash1.39B3.85B36%
Total Debt788M288M274%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HUBS vs SNOW: Fundamental Ratings
HUBS
SNOW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
427
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5456
SMR RATING
1..100
9196
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7738
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
76100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SNOW's Valuation (90) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that SNOW’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

HUBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as SNOW (56) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to SNOW’s over the last 12 months.

HUBS's SMR Rating (91) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as SNOW (96) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to SNOW’s over the last 12 months.

SNOW's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (77) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that SNOW’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

HUBS's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as SNOW (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to SNOW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HUBSSNOW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNOW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GOSS1.290.04
+3.20%
Gossamer Bio
WS25.510.26
+1.03%
Worthington Steel
MMM144.77-2.41
-1.64%
3M Company
NXST169.17-3.21
-1.86%
Nexstar Media Group
BRNS0.96-0.04
-4.00%
Barinthus Biotherapeutics plc

HUBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUBS
1D Price
Change %
HUBS100%
-0.65%
CRM - HUBS
67%
Closely correlated
+0.38%
SHOP - HUBS
65%
Loosely correlated
-4.31%
NOW - HUBS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
TEAM - HUBS
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.08%
FRSH - HUBS
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
More

SNOW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNOW has been loosely correlated with MDB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SNOW jumps, then MDB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNOW
1D Price
Change %
SNOW100%
+0.18%
MDB - SNOW
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.14%
NET - SNOW
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
DDOG - SNOW
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.07%
HUBS - SNOW
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.46%
PATH - SNOW
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.89%
More