HUBS
Price
$439.37
Change
+$9.47 (+2.20%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
22.65B
81 days until earnings call
SNOW
Price
$199.08
Change
+$4.18 (+2.14%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
65.03B
11 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HUBS vs SNOW

Header iconHUBS vs SNOW Comparison
Open Charts HUBS vs SNOWBanner chart's image
HUBSPOT
Price$439.37
Change+$9.47 (+2.20%)
Volume$856.42K
Capitalization22.65B
Snowflake
Price$199.08
Change+$4.18 (+2.14%)
Volume$3.34M
Capitalization65.03B
HUBS vs SNOW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNOW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HUBS vs. SNOW commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUBS is a Hold and SNOW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (HUBS: $429.90 vs. SNOW: $194.90)
Brand notoriety: HUBS and SNOW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HUBS: 88% vs. SNOW: 75%
Market capitalization -- HUBS: $22.65B vs. SNOW: $65.03B
HUBS [@Packaged Software] is valued at $22.65B. SNOW’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $65.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $325.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HUBS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSNOW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SNOW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SNOW is a better buy in the long-term than HUBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HUBS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNOW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HUBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SNOW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HUBS is a better buy in the short-term than SNOW.

Price Growth

HUBS (@Packaged Software) experienced а -6.92% price change this week, while SNOW (@Packaged Software) price change was -5.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

HUBS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

SNOW is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.20% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SNOW($65B) has a higher market cap than HUBS($22.7B). SNOW YTD gains are higher at: 26.222 vs. HUBS (-38.301). HUBS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 119M vs. SNOW (-1.2B). SNOW has more cash in the bank: 3.91B vs. HUBS (2.04B). HUBS has less debt than SNOW: HUBS (655M) vs SNOW (2.69B). SNOW has higher revenues than HUBS: SNOW (3.84B) vs HUBS (2.72B).
HUBSSNOWHUBS / SNOW
Capitalization22.7B65B35%
EBITDA119M-1.2B-10%
Gain YTD-38.30126.222-146%
P/E Ratio7023.44N/A-
Revenue2.72B3.84B71%
Total Cash2.04B3.91B52%
Total Debt655M2.69B24%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HUBS vs SNOW: Fundamental Ratings
HUBS
SNOW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6059
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7261
SMR RATING
1..100
9197
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9150
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
77100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SNOW's Valuation (90) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that SNOW’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

SNOW's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as HUBS (72) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that SNOW’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

HUBS's SMR Rating (91) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as SNOW (97) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to SNOW’s over the last 12 months.

SNOW's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (91) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that SNOW’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

HUBS's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as SNOW (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to SNOW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HUBSSNOW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNOW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RINF32.770.05
+0.16%
ProShares Inflation Expectations
GGUS60.880.05
+0.09%
Goldman Sachs MktBt Russell LgCpGrEqETF
YMAR25.930.01
+0.02%
FT Vest Intl Eq Mod Bffr ETF Mar
BNDS50.09-0.06
-0.11%
Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF
FSEC43.68-0.11
-0.25%
Fidelity Investment Grade Sec ETF

HUBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUBS
1D Price
Change %
HUBS100%
-1.79%
CRM - HUBS
72%
Closely correlated
-1.54%
TEAM - HUBS
71%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
NOW - HUBS
68%
Closely correlated
-1.44%
S - HUBS
67%
Closely correlated
-3.61%
CRWD - HUBS
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.68%
More

SNOW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNOW has been closely correlated with MDB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNOW jumps, then MDB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNOW
1D Price
Change %
SNOW100%
-1.00%
MDB - SNOW
67%
Closely correlated
-1.48%
NET - SNOW
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.99%
DDOG - SNOW
58%
Loosely correlated
-3.26%
HUBS - SNOW
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.79%
PCOR - SNOW
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.55%
More