HUBS
Price
$487.43
Change
+$23.12 (+4.98%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
25.69B
60 days until earnings call
SNOW
Price
$225.60
Change
+$3.70 (+1.67%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
75.27B
81 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HUBS vs SNOW

Header iconHUBS vs SNOW Comparison
Open Charts HUBS vs SNOWBanner chart's image
HUBSPOT
Price$487.43
Change+$23.12 (+4.98%)
Volume$4.16K
Capitalization25.69B
Snowflake
Price$225.60
Change+$3.70 (+1.67%)
Volume$27.87K
Capitalization75.27B
HUBS vs SNOW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNOW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HUBS vs. SNOW commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUBS is a Buy and SNOW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (HUBS: $487.53 vs. SNOW: $225.58)
Brand notoriety: HUBS and SNOW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HUBS: 123% vs. SNOW: 113%
Market capitalization -- HUBS: $25.69B vs. SNOW: $75.27B
HUBS [@Packaged Software] is valued at $25.69B. SNOW’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $75.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $316.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HUBS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSNOW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SNOW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SNOW is a better buy in the long-term than HUBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HUBS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNOW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HUBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SNOW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HUBS is a better buy in the short-term than SNOW.

Price Growth

HUBS (@Packaged Software) experienced а +0.90% price change this week, while SNOW (@Packaged Software) price change was -5.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

HUBS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

SNOW is expected to report earnings on Nov 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.74% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SNOW($75.3B) has a higher market cap than HUBS($25.7B). SNOW YTD gains are higher at: 43.708 vs. HUBS (-33.363). HUBS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 126M vs. SNOW (-1.2B). SNOW has more cash in the bank: 3.91B vs. HUBS (1.67B). HUBS has less debt than SNOW: HUBS (281M) vs SNOW (2.69B). SNOW has higher revenues than HUBS: SNOW (3.84B) vs HUBS (2.85B).
HUBSSNOWHUBS / SNOW
Capitalization25.7B75.3B34%
EBITDA126M-1.2B-11%
Gain YTD-33.36343.708-76%
P/E Ratio7023.44N/A-
Revenue2.85B3.84B74%
Total Cash1.67B3.91B43%
Total Debt281M2.69B10%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HUBS vs SNOW: Fundamental Ratings
HUBS
SNOW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
667
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7457
SMR RATING
1..100
9297
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8339
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
77100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5049

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SNOW's Valuation (91) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that SNOW’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

SNOW's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as HUBS (74) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that SNOW’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

HUBS's SMR Rating (92) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as SNOW (97) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to SNOW’s over the last 12 months.

SNOW's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (83) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that SNOW’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

HUBS's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as SNOW (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to SNOW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HUBSSNOW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNOW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FNGG226.543.73
+1.67%
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares
TLTI46.170.32
+0.70%
NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Yr Trsy Bd ETF
LQDH92.680.20
+0.22%
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corp Bd ETF
JMST50.950.01
+0.03%
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Inc ETF
LALT22.24-0.15
-0.65%
First Trust Multi-Strat Alt ETF

HUBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with TEAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then TEAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUBS
1D Price
Change %
HUBS100%
-1.78%
TEAM - HUBS
72%
Closely correlated
-1.52%
CRM - HUBS
72%
Closely correlated
-4.85%
NOW - HUBS
69%
Closely correlated
-2.26%
S - HUBS
67%
Closely correlated
+0.72%
FRSH - HUBS
66%
Closely correlated
-0.61%
More

SNOW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNOW has been closely correlated with MDB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNOW jumps, then MDB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNOW
1D Price
Change %
SNOW100%
-3.24%
MDB - SNOW
67%
Closely correlated
+2.93%
NET - SNOW
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.08%
DDOG - SNOW
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
HUBS - SNOW
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.78%
PCOR - SNOW
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.80%
More