HUBS
Price
$483.17
Change
+$6.83 (+1.43%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
25.46B
65 days until earnings call
QTWO
Price
$78.73
Change
-$0.10 (-0.13%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
4.92B
58 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HUBS vs QTWO

Header iconHUBS vs QTWO Comparison
Open Charts HUBS vs QTWOBanner chart's image
HUBSPOT
Price$483.17
Change+$6.83 (+1.43%)
Volume$817.6K
Capitalization25.46B
Q2 Holdings
Price$78.73
Change-$0.10 (-0.13%)
Volume$727.68K
Capitalization4.92B
HUBS vs QTWO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HUBS vs. QTWO commentary
Sep 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUBS is a Buy and QTWO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 02, 2025
Stock price -- (HUBS: $483.17 vs. QTWO: $78.73)
Brand notoriety: HUBS and QTWO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HUBS: 91% vs. QTWO: 96%
Market capitalization -- HUBS: $25.46B vs. QTWO: $4.92B
HUBS [@Packaged Software] is valued at $25.46B. QTWO’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $4.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $320.59B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HUBS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQTWO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QTWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, QTWO is a better buy in the long-term than HUBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HUBS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QTWO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HUBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • QTWO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HUBS is a better buy in the short-term than QTWO.

Price Growth

HUBS (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.87% price change this week, while QTWO (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

HUBS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

QTWO is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-0.62% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUBS($25.5B) has a higher market cap than QTWO($4.92B). HUBS has higher P/E ratio than QTWO: HUBS (7023.44) vs QTWO (1312.17). QTWO YTD gains are higher at: -21.778 vs. HUBS (-30.656). HUBS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 126M vs. QTWO (77.5M). HUBS has more cash in the bank: 1.67B vs. QTWO (532M). HUBS has less debt than QTWO: HUBS (281M) vs QTWO (539M). HUBS has higher revenues than QTWO: HUBS (2.85B) vs QTWO (743M).
HUBSQTWOHUBS / QTWO
Capitalization25.5B4.92B519%
EBITDA126M77.5M163%
Gain YTD-30.656-21.778141%
P/E Ratio7023.441312.17535%
Revenue2.85B743M383%
Total Cash1.67B532M314%
Total Debt281M539M52%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HUBS vs QTWO: Fundamental Ratings
HUBS
QTWO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
70100
SMR RATING
1..100
9291
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8463
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7753
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QTWO's Valuation (96) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as HUBS (100). This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

HUBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as QTWO (100). This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's SMR Rating (91) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as HUBS (92). This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as HUBS (84). This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as HUBS (77). This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HUBSQTWO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LIAP217.39N/A
N/A
LifeX 2057 Infl-Prt Longevity Inc ETF
LSAF44.32-0.15
-0.34%
LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor® US Cr Eq ETF
SNAV33.52-0.18
-0.53%
Mohr Sector Nav ETF
DSI121.40-0.91
-0.74%
iShares ESG MSCI KLD 400 ETF
IGPT50.88-0.71
-1.37%
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF

HUBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUBS
1D Price
Change %
HUBS100%
+1.43%
CRM - HUBS
72%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
TEAM - HUBS
71%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
NOW - HUBS
69%
Closely correlated
-1.20%
S - HUBS
67%
Closely correlated
+7.10%
FRSH - HUBS
66%
Closely correlated
-0.44%
More

QTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTWO has been closely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTWO jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTWO
1D Price
Change %
QTWO100%
-0.13%
FRSH - QTWO
69%
Closely correlated
-0.44%
HUBS - QTWO
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.43%
ALKT - QTWO
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
WEAV - QTWO
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.17%
ADSK - QTWO
59%
Loosely correlated
+9.09%
More