It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HUBS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMDB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HUBS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
HUBS (@Packaged Software) experienced а +3.46% price change this week, while MDB (@Packaged Software) price change was +9.23% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.45%.
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
MDB is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
HUBS | MDB | HUBS / MDB | |
Capitalization | 32.3B | 26.1B | 124% |
EBITDA | -81.23M | -122M | 67% |
Gain YTD | -22.154 | -4.983 | 445% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 2.17B | 1.68B | 129% |
Total Cash | 1.39B | 2.02B | 69% |
Total Debt | 788M | 1.18B | 67% |
HUBS | MDB | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 62 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 95 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 5 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MDB's Valuation (62) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that MDB’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDB (95) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MDB’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's SMR Rating (90) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as MDB (90) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to MDB’s over the last 12 months.
MDB's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (62) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that MDB’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's P/E Growth Rating (74) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as MDB (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to MDB’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS | MDB | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 6 days ago70% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago78% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago87% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago77% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago75% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago81% | 2 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago67% | 6 days ago79% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago80% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago84% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
VOX | 170.38 | 0.01 | +0.01% |
Vanguard Communication Services ETF | |||
WBIF | 29.13 | N/A | N/A |
WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF | |||
MMTM | 269.38 | -0.05 | -0.02% |
SPDR® S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF | |||
QCJA | 20.78 | -0.01 | -0.05% |
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Cnsrv Buffr ETF - Jan | |||
BKMC | 104.66 | -0.09 | -0.09% |
BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HUBS | 100% | +2.61% | ||
CRM - HUBS | 72% Closely correlated | +0.96% | ||
TEAM - HUBS | 69% Closely correlated | +2.22% | ||
NOW - HUBS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.44% | ||
SHOP - HUBS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
S - HUBS | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.64% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDB has been closely correlated with SNOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDB jumps, then SNOW could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MDB | 100% | +1.23% | ||
SNOW - MDB | 67% Closely correlated | +2.51% | ||
NET - MDB | 63% Loosely correlated | +3.19% | ||
HUBS - MDB | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.61% | ||
CFLT - MDB | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.20% | ||
GTLB - MDB | 56% Loosely correlated | +3.30% | ||
More |