It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HUBG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUPS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HUBG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UPS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
HUBG (@Air Freight/Couriers) experienced а +1.93% price change this week, while UPS (@Air Freight/Couriers) price change was -0.18% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Air Freight/Couriers industry was -0.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.17%.
HUBG is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
UPS is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
The Air Freight/Couriers industry operates air transportation and recurring delivery services. This includes companies offering same-day deliveries, scheduled delivery and logistical services. The proliferation of e-commerce/online retail with a growing emphasis on faster delivery has expanded opportunities for this industry, and induced more competition. United Parcel Service, Inc., FedEx Corporation and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. are some of the major companies in this industry.
HUBG | UPS | HUBG / UPS | |
Capitalization | 2.63B | 127B | 2% |
EBITDA | 407M | 12.7B | 3% |
Gain YTD | 10.034 | -11.961 | -84% |
P/E Ratio | 15.96 | 18.93 | 84% |
Revenue | 4.2B | 91B | 5% |
Total Cash | 187M | 6.07B | 3% |
Total Debt | 576M | 26.7B | 2% |
HUBG | UPS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 61 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 80 | 27 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | 29 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UPS's Valuation (34) in the Air Freight Or Couriers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBG (89). This means that UPS’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBG’s over the last 12 months.
HUBG's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Air Freight Or Couriers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UPS (61). This means that HUBG’s stock grew somewhat faster than UPS’s over the last 12 months.
UPS's SMR Rating (27) in the Air Freight Or Couriers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBG (80). This means that UPS’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBG’s over the last 12 months.
HUBG's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Air Freight Or Couriers industry is in the same range as UPS (58). This means that HUBG’s stock grew similarly to UPS’s over the last 12 months.
HUBG's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Air Freight Or Couriers industry is in the same range as UPS (29). This means that HUBG’s stock grew similarly to UPS’s over the last 12 months.
HUBG | UPS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago60% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago63% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago53% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago55% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago51% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago68% | 8 days ago0% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago54% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago51% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago45% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBG has been closely correlated with LSTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBG jumps, then LSTR could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUBG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HUBG | 100% | +1.72% | ||
LSTR - HUBG | 70% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
JBHT - HUBG | 66% Closely correlated | -1.73% | ||
EXPD - HUBG | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.63% | ||
UPS - HUBG | 43% Loosely correlated | +2.72% | ||
RLGT - HUBG | 39% Loosely correlated | -4.44% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UPS has been loosely correlated with GXO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UPS jumps, then GXO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
UPS | 100% | +2.72% | ||
GXO - UPS | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.68% | ||
EXPD - UPS | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.63% | ||
FDX - UPS | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.61% | ||
HUBG - UPS | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.72% | ||
CYRX - UPS | 32% Poorly correlated | -3.52% | ||
More |