HTZ
Price
$4.11
Change
+$0.32 (+8.44%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
108 days until earnings call
WD
Price
$107.57
Change
-$1.43 (-1.31%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
82 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HTZ vs WD

Header iconHTZ vs WD Comparison
Open Charts HTZ vs WDBanner chart's image
Hertz Global Holdings
Price$4.11
Change+$0.32 (+8.44%)
Volume$11.39M
CapitalizationN/A
Walker & Dunlop
Price$107.57
Change-$1.43 (-1.31%)
Volume$132.76K
CapitalizationN/A
HTZ vs WD Comparison Chart
Loading...
HTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
WD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HTZ vs. WD commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HTZ is a Hold and WD is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (HTZ: $4.11 vs. WD: $107.57)
Brand notoriety: HTZ and WD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HTZ: 204% vs. WD: 74%
Market capitalization -- HTZ: $2.39B vs. WD: $3.4B
HTZ [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $2.39B. WD’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $3.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HTZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HTZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WD is a better buy in the long-term than HTZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HTZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WD’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HTZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HTZ is a better buy in the short-term than WD.

Price Growth

HTZ (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +32.15% price change this week, while WD (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -3.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

HTZ is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2025.

WD is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+0.36% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WD($3.4B) has a higher market cap than HTZ($2.39B). WD has higher P/E ratio than HTZ: WD (31.03) vs HTZ (5.53). WD YTD gains are higher at: -1.175 vs. HTZ (-60.443). HTZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.65B vs. WD (364M). HTZ has more cash in the bank: 764M vs. WD (329M). WD has less debt than HTZ: WD (1.47B) vs HTZ (17.8B). HTZ has higher revenues than WD: HTZ (9.37B) vs WD (1.05B).
HTZWDHTZ / WD
Capitalization2.39B3.4B70%
EBITDA3.65B364M1,003%
Gain YTD-60.443-1.1755,143%
P/E Ratio5.5331.0318%
Revenue9.37B1.05B889%
Total Cash764M329M232%
Total Debt17.8B1.47B1,210%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WD: Fundamental Ratings
WD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
57
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
48
SMR RATING
1..100
81
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
20
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HTZWD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
0%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
WD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

HTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HTZ has been loosely correlated with CAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HTZ jumps, then CAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HTZ
1D Price
Change %
HTZ100%
+8.44%
CAR - HTZ
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
CACC - HTZ
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
GATX - HTZ
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.36%
WD - HTZ
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.31%
HRI - HTZ
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.08%
More

WD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WD has been closely correlated with PFSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WD jumps, then PFSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WD
1D Price
Change %
WD100%
-1.31%
PFSI - WD
69%
Closely correlated
-1.45%
HRI - WD
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.08%
HEES - WD
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
NAVI - WD
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
UWMC - WD
54%
Loosely correlated
-2.71%
More