HTZ
Price
$5.23
Change
+$0.10 (+1.95%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.55B
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OMF
Price
$64.78
Change
+$1.73 (+2.74%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.34B
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HTZ vs OMF

Header iconHTZ vs OMF Comparison
Open Charts HTZ vs OMFBanner chart's image
Hertz Global Holdings
Price$5.23
Change+$0.10 (+1.95%)
Volume$60.16K
Capitalization1.55B
OneMain Holdings
Price$64.78
Change+$1.73 (+2.74%)
Volume$13.94K
Capitalization7.34B
HTZ vs OMF Comparison Chart in %
HTZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HTZ vs. OMF commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HTZ is a Hold and OMF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (HTZ: $5.13 vs. OMF: $63.05)
Brand notoriety: HTZ and OMF are both not notable
HTZ represents the Finance/Rental/Leasing, while OMF is part of the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HTZ: 23% vs. OMF: 52%
Market capitalization -- HTZ: $1.55B vs. OMF: $7.34B
HTZ [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $1.55B. OMF’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $7.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $51.24B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $637.62B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $7.38B. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $21.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HTZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOMF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HTZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OMF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the long-term than HTZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HTZ’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HTZ’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 8 bearish.
  • OMF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the short-term than HTZ.

Price Growth

HTZ (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -2.47% price change this week, while OMF (@Savings Banks) price change was +2.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.88%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

HTZ is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

OMF is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+0.91% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

@Savings Banks (+0.08% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMF($7.34B) has a higher market cap than HTZ($1.55B). HTZ has higher P/E ratio than OMF: HTZ (22.21) vs OMF (10.57). HTZ YTD gains are higher at: 40.164 vs. OMF (30.459). HTZ has less debt than OMF: HTZ (19.9B) vs OMF (22.3B). HTZ has higher revenues than OMF: HTZ (8.61B) vs OMF (4.87B).
HTZOMFHTZ / OMF
Capitalization1.55B7.34B21%
EBITDA1.13BN/A-
Gain YTD40.16430.459132%
P/E Ratio22.2110.57210%
Revenue8.61B4.87B177%
Total Cash503MN/A-
Total Debt19.9B22.3B89%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OMF: Fundamental Ratings
OMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
22
SMR RATING
1..100
8
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HTZOMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
84%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HTZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCOBX45.65N/A
N/A
DWS International Opportunities S
BGLAX14.96N/A
N/A
Brookfield Global Listed InfrastructureA
VMCIX79.34N/A
N/A
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Institutional
SWLGX17.65N/A
N/A
Schwab ® US Large-Cap Growth Idx
TAIWX13.90N/A
N/A
Nuveen Quant Intl Small Cap Eq W

HTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HTZ has been loosely correlated with CAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HTZ jumps, then CAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HTZ
1D Price
Change %
HTZ100%
+3.01%
CAR - HTZ
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
BBDC - HTZ
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
LC - HTZ
41%
Loosely correlated
+2.70%
NAVI - HTZ
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.94%
OMF - HTZ
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
More

OMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMF has been closely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMF jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMF
1D Price
Change %
OMF100%
+1.12%
SYF - OMF
86%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
COF - OMF
84%
Closely correlated
+1.64%
AXP - OMF
83%
Closely correlated
+0.10%
BFH - OMF
81%
Closely correlated
+1.96%
ALLY - OMF
80%
Closely correlated
-0.62%
More