HTWSF
Price
$1.35
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
MTNOY
Price
$4.36
Change
-$0.22 (-4.80%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

HTWSF vs MTNOY

Header iconHTWSF vs MTNOY Comparison
Open Charts HTWSF vs MTNOYBanner chart's image
Helios Towers
Price$1.35
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$32.5K
CapitalizationN/A
MTN Group
Price$4.36
Change-$0.22 (-4.80%)
Volume$13.59K
CapitalizationN/A
HTWSF vs MTNOY Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HTWSF vs. MTNOY commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HTWSF is a Hold and MTNOY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (HTWSF: $1.35 vs. MTNOY: $4.58)
Brand notoriety: HTWSF and MTNOY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HTWSF: 173% vs. MTNOY: 207%
Market capitalization -- HTWSF: $1.22B vs. MTNOY: $14.33B
HTWSF [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $1.22B. MTNOY’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $14.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HTWSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMTNOY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HTWSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MTNOY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MTNOY is a better buy in the long-term than HTWSF.

Price Growth

HTWSF (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а -5.44% price change this week, while MTNOY (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was -4.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +9.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +63.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

MTNOY is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (+9.52% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTNOY($14.3B) has a higher market cap than HTWSF($1.22B). HTWSF YTD gains are higher at: 16.379 vs. MTNOY (-24.470). MTNOY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 90.8B vs. HTWSF (113M). MTNOY has higher revenues than HTWSF: MTNOY (207B) vs HTWSF (502M).
HTWSFMTNOYHTWSF / MTNOY
Capitalization1.22B14.3B9%
EBITDA113M90.8B0%
Gain YTD16.379-24.470-67%
P/E RatioN/A12.95-
Revenue502M207B0%
Total Cash389MN/A-
Total Debt1.47BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTNOY: Fundamental Ratings
MTNOY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
61
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
73
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X90584.1640002628.351600
+2.99%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA330.241.75
+0.53%
Tesla
AAPL225.120.89
+0.40%
Apple
SPY597.190.29
+0.05%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.46-0.38
-1.42%
GameStop Corp

HTWSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HTWSF and CLCMF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HTWSF and CLCMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HTWSF
1D Price
Change %
HTWSF100%
-0.74%
CLCMF - HTWSF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SFTBY - HTWSF
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.75%
MTNOY - HTWSF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
LLEIF - HTWSF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FYBR - HTWSF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.52%
More

MTNOY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MTNOY and TELNY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTNOY and TELNY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTNOY
1D Price
Change %
MTNOY100%
+0.66%
TELNY - MTNOY
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.16%
HTWSF - MTNOY
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
CCOI - MTNOY
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
PCWLF - MTNOY
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
NUVR - MTNOY
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More