It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HTWSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLBTYA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HTWSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LBTYA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
HTWSF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +4.02% price change this week, while LBTYA (@Major Telecommunications) price change was +0.83% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.33%.
Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
| HTWSF | LBTYA | HTWSF / LBTYA | |
| Capitalization | 2.18B | 3.65B | 60% |
| EBITDA | 487M | -1.84B | -27% |
| Gain YTD | 97.757 | -14.655 | -667% |
| P/E Ratio | 28.03 | 2.00 | 1,401% |
| Revenue | 820M | 4.63B | 18% |
| Total Cash | 184M | 3.15B | 6% |
| Total Debt | 1.95B | 10.5B | 19% |
LBTYA | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| HTWSF | LBTYA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 59% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that HTWSF and LBTYA have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HTWSF and LBTYA's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HTWSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HTWSF | 100% | -0.19% | ||
| LBTYA - HTWSF | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.46% | ||
| SFTBY - HTWSF | 24% Poorly correlated | -5.87% | ||
| LBTYK - HTWSF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SKM - HTWSF | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.29% | ||
| VDMCY - HTWSF | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.11% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LBTYA has been closely correlated with LBTYK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 96% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LBTYA jumps, then LBTYK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LBTYA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LBTYA | 100% | -0.46% | ||
| LBTYK - LBTYA | 96% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| IDCC - LBTYA | 51% Loosely correlated | -4.57% | ||
| CABO - LBTYA | 45% Loosely correlated | -3.85% | ||
| S - LBTYA | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| LBTYB - LBTYA | 36% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||