HTT
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
464.01M
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LU
Price
$2.55
Change
-$1.38 (-35.11%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.42B
43 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HTT vs LU

Header iconHTT vs LU Comparison
Open Charts HTT vs LUBanner chart's image
High Templar Tech
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$244.18K
Capitalization464.01M
Lufax Holding
Price$2.55
Change-$1.38 (-35.11%)
Volume$1.3M
Capitalization2.42B
HTT vs LU Comparison Chart in %
HTT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HTT vs. LU commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HTT is a StrongBuy and LU is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (HTT: $2.81 vs. LU: $2.55)
Brand notoriety: HTT and LU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HTT: 81% vs. LU: 117%
Market capitalization -- HTT: $464.01M vs. LU: $2.42B
HTT [@Savings Banks] is valued at $464.01M. LU’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $2.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $632.61B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $20.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HTT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLU’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HTT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LU’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LU is a better buy in the long-term than HTT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HTT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LU’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HTT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HTT is a better buy in the short-term than LU.

Price Growth

HTT (@Savings Banks) experienced а -8.77% price change this week, while LU (@Savings Banks) price change was -5.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -2.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

HTT is expected to report earnings on Mar 25, 2026.

LU is expected to report earnings on Mar 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-2.96% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LU($2.42B) has a higher market cap than HTT($464M). LU has higher P/E ratio than HTT: LU (20.60) vs HTT (11.22). LU YTD gains are higher at: -0.391 vs. HTT (-20.845).
HTTLUHTT / LU
Capitalization464M2.42B19%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-20.845-0.3915,336%
P/E Ratio11.2220.6054%
RevenueN/A20.3B-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A47.6B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HTT: Fundamental Ratings
HTT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
79
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HTTLU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HTT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSUAX25.480.46
+1.84%
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure A
SETAX14.840.03
+0.20%
SEI Real Estate F (SIMT)
FGDMX143.67N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Communication ServicesA
HDGCX33.07-0.28
-0.84%
Hartford Dividend and Growth C
SUSIX13.32-0.16
-1.19%
State Street Instl US Equity Inv

HTT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HTT has been loosely correlated with SOFI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HTT jumps, then SOFI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HTT
1D Price
Change %
HTT100%
-2.09%
SOFI - HTT
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.45%
YRD - HTT
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.30%
FINV - HTT
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.52%
QFIN - HTT
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.96%
LU - HTT
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
More

LU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LU has been loosely correlated with YRD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LU jumps, then YRD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LU
1D Price
Change %
LU100%
-1.92%
YRD - LU
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.30%
FINV - LU
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.52%
QFIN - LU
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.96%
LX - LU
44%
Loosely correlated
-3.57%
XYF - LU
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.90%
More