HTSUF
Price
$28.94
Change
-$3.36 (-10.40%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
2.51B
KSPHF
Price
$27.13
Change
+$3.90 (+16.79%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
Capitalization
979.3M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HTSUF vs KSPHF

Header iconHTSUF vs KSPHF Comparison
Open Charts HTSUF vs KSPHFBanner chart's image
Hisamitsu Pharmaceutical
Price$28.94
Change-$3.36 (-10.40%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.51B
Kissei Pharmaceutical
Price$27.13
Change+$3.90 (+16.79%)
Volume$100
Capitalization979.3M
HTSUF vs KSPHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HTSUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KSPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HTSUF vs. KSPHF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HTSUF is a Hold and KSPHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (HTSUF: $28.94 vs. KSPHF: $27.13)
Brand notoriety: HTSUF and KSPHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HTSUF: 100% vs. KSPHF: 13%
Market capitalization -- HTSUF: $2.51B vs. KSPHF: $979.3M
HTSUF [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $2.51B. KSPHF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $979.3M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $77.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $3.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HTSUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKSPHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HTSUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KSPHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, KSPHF is a better buy in the long-term than HTSUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HTSUF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KSPHF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HTSUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • KSPHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KSPHF is a better buy in the short-term than HTSUF.

Price Growth

HTSUF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KSPHF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +87.04%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+0.92% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HTSUF($2.51B) has a higher market cap than KSPHF($979M). HTSUF has higher P/E ratio than KSPHF: HTSUF (25.19) vs KSPHF (9.18). HTSUF YTD gains are higher at: 17.839 vs. KSPHF (8.520). HTSUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 19.4B vs. KSPHF (17.8B). HTSUF has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. KSPHF (49.6B). HTSUF has less debt than KSPHF: HTSUF (1.2B) vs KSPHF (1.49B). HTSUF has higher revenues than KSPHF: HTSUF (134B) vs KSPHF (67.5B).
HTSUFKSPHFHTSUF / KSPHF
Capitalization2.51B979M256%
EBITDA19.4B17.8B109%
Gain YTD17.8398.520209%
P/E Ratio25.199.18274%
Revenue134B67.5B199%
Total Cash137B49.6B276%
Total Debt1.2B1.49B81%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HTSUF vs KSPHF: Fundamental Ratings
HTSUF
KSPHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6663
SMR RATING
1..100
8180
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5649
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9142
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KSPHF's Valuation (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HTSUF (90). This means that KSPHF’s stock grew significantly faster than HTSUF’s over the last 12 months.

KSPHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as HTSUF (66). This means that KSPHF’s stock grew similarly to HTSUF’s over the last 12 months.

KSPHF's SMR Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as HTSUF (81). This means that KSPHF’s stock grew similarly to HTSUF’s over the last 12 months.

KSPHF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as HTSUF (56). This means that KSPHF’s stock grew similarly to HTSUF’s over the last 12 months.

KSPHF's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HTSUF (91). This means that KSPHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HTSUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HTSUFKSPHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
27%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
12%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
7%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
8%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
7%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
24%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
3%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
11%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HTSUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KSPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BARAX95.940.86
+0.90%
Baron Asset Retail
HSRUX26.270.23
+0.88%
Carillon Eagle Small Cap Growth R6
BRXVX15.850.08
+0.51%
MFS Blended Research Intl Eq R6
RIDFX26.880.09
+0.34%
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R5
SMNIX27.340.05
+0.18%
Steward Equity Market Neutral I

HTSUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HTSUF and CHBRF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HTSUF and CHBRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HTSUF
1D Price
Change %
HTSUF100%
N/A
CHBRF - HTSUF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INIS - HTSUF
10%
Poorly correlated
-8.52%
INDV - HTSUF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
IPSEF - HTSUF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GTBIF - HTSUF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
More

KSPHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KSPHF and MGWFF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KSPHF and MGWFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KSPHF
1D Price
Change %
KSPHF100%
N/A
MGWFF - KSPHF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LVRLF - KSPHF
5%
Poorly correlated
-8.29%
MILFF - KSPHF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HSTI - KSPHF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HTSUF - KSPHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More