Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HTSCX vs SSGSX
HTSCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HTSCX vs SSGSX
Hartford Small Cap Value C
Price$10.15
Change-$0.10 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets180.21M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.49
Change-$0.48 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.5B
HTSCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HTSCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HTSCX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.5B vs. HTSCX (180M). HTSCX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HTSCX (0.73) vs SSGSX (0.50). HTSCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HTSCX (21 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). HTSCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). HTSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). HTSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: HTSCX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). HTSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.76 vs. SSGSX (-5.53). HTSCX return over 5 years is better than : 41.70 vs. SSGSX (15.88).
| HTSCX | SSGSX | HTSCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.06 | 1.26 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 1.26 | 170% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.883 | -2.025 | 192% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 180M | 5.5B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 0.50 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.76 | -5.53 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.60 | -9.76 | -6% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.70 | 15.88 | 263% |
| Returns for 10 years | -12.90 | 15.23 | -85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers