HTLM
Price
$2.40
Change
-$0.12 (-4.76%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
215.25M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SVV
Price
$9.45
Change
+$0.28 (+3.05%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.48B
55 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HTLM vs SVV

Header iconHTLM vs SVV Comparison
Open Charts HTLM vs SVVBanner chart's image
HomesToLife
Price$2.40
Change-$0.12 (-4.76%)
Volume$9.94K
Capitalization215.25M
Savers Value Village
Price$9.45
Change+$0.28 (+3.05%)
Volume$530.24K
Capitalization1.48B
HTLM vs SVV Comparison Chart in %
HTLM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SVV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HTLM vs. SVV commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HTLM is a StrongBuy and SVV is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (HTLM: $2.40 vs. SVV: $9.45)
Brand notoriety: HTLM and SVV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HTLM: 59% vs. SVV: 42%
Market capitalization -- HTLM: $215.25M vs. SVV: $1.48B
HTLM [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $215.25M. SVV’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $1.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $50.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HTLM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSVV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HTLM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SVV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SVV is a better buy in the long-term than HTLM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HTLM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVV’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HTLM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SVV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SVV is a better buy in the short-term than HTLM.

Price Growth

HTLM (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -13.51% price change this week, while SVV (@Specialty Stores) price change was +0.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

SVV is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-0.96% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SVV($1.48B) has a higher market cap than HTLM($215M). HTLM has higher P/E ratio than SVV: HTLM (201.21) vs SVV (66.15). SVV YTD gains are higher at: -7.805 vs. HTLM (-70.979). SVV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 146M vs. HTLM (5.33M). SVV has more cash in the bank: 63.5M vs. HTLM (21.8M). HTLM has less debt than SVV: HTLM (16.5M) vs SVV (1.37B). SVV has higher revenues than HTLM: SVV (1.62B) vs HTLM (40.3M).
HTLMSVVHTLM / SVV
Capitalization215M1.48B15%
EBITDA5.33M146M4%
Gain YTD-70.979-7.805909%
P/E Ratio201.2166.15304%
Revenue40.3M1.62B2%
Total Cash21.8M63.5M34%
Total Debt16.5M1.37B1%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HTLMSVV
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HTLM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SVV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CDOZX40.860.20
+0.49%
Columbia Dividend Opportunity Inst
IVOSX17.290.06
+0.35%
Nomura Mid Cap Income Opps R6
PIORX44.750.11
+0.25%
Victory Pioneer R
WCMLX14.080.01
+0.07%
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
CRMMX22.12N/A
N/A
CRM Mid Cap Value Inv

HTLM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HTLM and CGTL have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HTLM and CGTL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HTLM
1D Price
Change %
HTLM100%
-4.74%
CGTL - HTLM
1%
Poorly correlated
+6.71%
JBDI - HTLM
0%
Poorly correlated
+6.11%
PTLE - HTLM
-1%
Poorly correlated
+1.94%
SVV - HTLM
-1%
Poorly correlated
+3.05%
RECT - HTLM
-4%
Poorly correlated
+5.63%
More

SVV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SVV has been loosely correlated with WSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SVV jumps, then WSM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVV
1D Price
Change %
SVV100%
+3.05%
WSM - SVV
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
HVT - SVV
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
GPI - SVV
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
LOW - SVV
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
HD - SVV
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
More