HTGC
Price
$18.84
Change
+$0.31 (+1.67%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
3.42B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TNYZF
Price
$7.00
Change
-$0.04 (-0.57%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
177.44M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HTGC vs TNYZF

Header iconHTGC vs TNYZF Comparison
Open Charts HTGC vs TNYZFBanner chart's image
Hercules Capital
Price$18.84
Change+$0.31 (+1.67%)
Volume$856.74K
Capitalization3.42B
Tiny
Price$7.00
Change-$0.04 (-0.57%)
Volume$1.9K
Capitalization177.44M
HTGC vs TNYZF Comparison Chart in %
HTGC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TNYZF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HTGC vs. TNYZF commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HTGC is a Hold and TNYZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (HTGC: $18.84 vs. TNYZF: $7.00)
Brand notoriety: HTGC and TNYZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HTGC: 73% vs. TNYZF: 52%
Market capitalization -- HTGC: $3.42B vs. TNYZF: $177.44M
HTGC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $3.42B. TNYZF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $177.44M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $169.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HTGC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTNYZF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HTGC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TNYZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HTGC is a better buy in the long-term than TNYZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HTGC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TNYZF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HTGC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TNYZF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HTGC is a better buy in the short-term than TNYZF.

Price Growth

HTGC (@Investment Managers) experienced а +3.29% price change this week, while TNYZF (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

HTGC is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.24% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HTGC($3.42B) has a higher market cap than TNYZF($177M). TNYZF has higher P/E ratio than HTGC: TNYZF (43.04) vs HTGC (10.83). TNYZF YTD gains are higher at: 2.339 vs. HTGC (0.106). HTGC has higher revenues than TNYZF: HTGC (405M) vs TNYZF (192M).
HTGCTNYZFHTGC / TNYZF
Capitalization3.42B177M1,934%
EBITDAN/A17.8M-
Gain YTD0.1062.3395%
P/E Ratio10.8343.0425%
Revenue405M192M211%
Total Cash51.2MN/A-
Total Debt2.17BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HTGC: Fundamental Ratings
HTGC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
78
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
22
SMR RATING
1..100
18
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HTGCTNYZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HTGC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TNYZF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X96929.3300001607.546900
+1.69%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.02N/A
N/A
GameStop Corp
AAPL259.96-1.09
-0.42%
Apple
SPY690.36-3.41
-0.49%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
TSLA439.20-8.00
-1.79%
Tesla

HTGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HTGC has been closely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HTGC jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HTGC
1D Price
Change %
HTGC100%
+1.67%
ARCC - HTGC
80%
Closely correlated
+1.95%
MAIN - HTGC
80%
Closely correlated
+2.60%
OBDC - HTGC
79%
Closely correlated
+1.93%
CSWC - HTGC
79%
Closely correlated
+2.18%
GSBD - HTGC
79%
Closely correlated
+2.43%
More

TNYZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TNYZF and HTGC have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TNYZF and HTGC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TNYZF
1D Price
Change %
TNYZF100%
-0.63%
HTGC - TNYZF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
HRZN - TNYZF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
BAM - TNYZF
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
EICB - TNYZF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NCDL - TNYZF
13%
Poorly correlated
+1.71%
More