HTGC
Price
$19.21
Change
+$0.19 (+1.00%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
52 days until earnings call
PFLT
Price
$10.68
Change
-$0.03 (-0.28%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
44 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HTGC vs PFLT

Header iconHTGC vs PFLT Comparison
Open Charts HTGC vs PFLTBanner chart's image
Hercules Capital
Price$19.21
Change+$0.19 (+1.00%)
Volume$1.28M
CapitalizationN/A
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
Price$10.68
Change-$0.03 (-0.28%)
Volume$2.44M
CapitalizationN/A
HTGC vs PFLT Comparison Chart
Loading...
HTGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HTGC vs. PFLT commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HTGC is a Hold and PFLT is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (HTGC: $19.21 vs. PFLT: $10.68)
Brand notoriety: HTGC and PFLT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HTGC: 122% vs. PFLT: 280%
Market capitalization -- HTGC: $2.88B vs. PFLT: $690.23M
HTGC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.88B. PFLT’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $690.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HTGC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePFLT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HTGC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PFLT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HTGC is a better buy in the long-term than PFLT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HTGC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFLT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HTGC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PFLT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HTGC is a better buy in the short-term than PFLT.

Price Growth

HTGC (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.03% price change this week, while PFLT (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

HTGC is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.

PFLT is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HTGC($2.88B) has a higher market cap than PFLT($690M). PFLT has higher P/E ratio than HTGC: PFLT (9.41) vs HTGC (7.88). HTGC YTD gains are higher at: 27.489 vs. PFLT (-1.682). PFLT has less debt than HTGC: PFLT (671M) vs HTGC (1.56B). HTGC has higher revenues than PFLT: HTGC (426M) vs PFLT (65.9M).
HTGCPFLTHTGC / PFLT
Capitalization2.88B690M418%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD27.489-1.682-1,635%
P/E Ratio7.889.4184%
Revenue426M65.9M646%
Total CashN/A15.1M-
Total Debt1.56B671M232%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HTGC vs PFLT: Fundamental Ratings
HTGC
PFLT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5066
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1146
SMR RATING
1..100
1335
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4857
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4795
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PFLT's Valuation (5) in the null industry is in the same range as HTGC (9). This means that PFLT’s stock grew similarly to HTGC’s over the last 12 months.

HTGC's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PFLT (46). This means that HTGC’s stock grew somewhat faster than PFLT’s over the last 12 months.

HTGC's SMR Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as PFLT (35). This means that HTGC’s stock grew similarly to PFLT’s over the last 12 months.

HTGC's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as PFLT (57). This means that HTGC’s stock grew similarly to PFLT’s over the last 12 months.

HTGC's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PFLT (95). This means that HTGC’s stock grew somewhat faster than PFLT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HTGCPFLT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HTGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X95104.940000-2119.789000
-2.18%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

HTGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HTGC has been closely correlated with MAIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HTGC jumps, then MAIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HTGC
1D Price
Change %
HTGC100%
+1.00%
MAIN - HTGC
68%
Closely correlated
+1.42%
ARCC - HTGC
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.18%
FSK - HTGC
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
CCAP - HTGC
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
BCSF - HTGC
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.65%
More

PFLT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFLT has been loosely correlated with MAIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PFLT jumps, then MAIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFLT
1D Price
Change %
PFLT100%
-0.28%
MAIN - PFLT
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.42%
ARCC - PFLT
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.18%
HTGC - PFLT
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
PNNT - PFLT
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.61%
FDUS - PFLT
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.99%
More