HTCO
Price
$6.22
Change
-$0.03 (-0.48%)
Updated
Aug 18, 03:27 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
35.63M
ZIM
Price
$16.31
Change
-$0.65 (-3.83%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.96B
2 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HTCO vs ZIM

Header iconHTCO vs ZIM Comparison
Open Charts HTCO vs ZIMBanner chart's image
High-Trend International Group
Price$6.22
Change-$0.03 (-0.48%)
Volume$100
Capitalization35.63M
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
Price$16.31
Change-$0.65 (-3.83%)
Volume$4.76M
Capitalization1.96B
HTCO vs ZIM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HTCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HTCO vs. ZIM commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HTCO is a Hold and ZIM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (HTCO: $6.25 vs. ZIM: $16.31)
Brand notoriety: HTCO and ZIM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HTCO: 19% vs. ZIM: 91%
Market capitalization -- HTCO: $35.63M vs. ZIM: $1.96B
HTCO [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $35.63M. ZIM’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $1.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $33.53B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HTCO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZIM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HTCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ZIM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HTCO and ZIM are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HTCO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZIM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HTCO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ZIM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HTCO is a better buy in the short-term than ZIM.

Price Growth

HTCO (@Marine Shipping) experienced а -13.31% price change this week, while ZIM (@Marine Shipping) price change was +5.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +1.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

ZIM is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+1.78% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZIM($1.97B) has a higher market cap than HTCO($35.6M). ZIM YTD gains are higher at: -3.504 vs. HTCO (-92.492). HTCO has less debt than ZIM: HTCO (7.01M) vs ZIM (5.88B).
HTCOZIMHTCO / ZIM
Capitalization35.6M1.97B2%
EBITDAN/A4.17B-
Gain YTD-92.492-3.5042,640%
P/E RatioN/A0.84-
RevenueN/A8.87B-
Total CashN/A2.31B-
Total Debt7.01M5.88B0%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HTCOZIM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HTCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HFYSX12.990.05
+0.39%
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val R4
JERTX12.200.04
+0.33%
Janus Henderson Global Real Estate T
CGVVX14.900.02
+0.13%
Causeway Global Value Inv
DGFYX32.460.03
+0.09%
Davis Global Y
MVCGX28.42-0.18
-0.63%
MFS Mid Cap Value R1

HTCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HTCO and NAT have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HTCO and NAT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HTCO
1D Price
Change %
HTCO100%
+3.48%
NAT - HTCO
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.71%
SHIP - HTCO
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
TORO - HTCO
8%
Poorly correlated
+4.83%
ZIM - HTCO
5%
Poorly correlated
-3.83%
CTRM - HTCO
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
More

ZIM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZIM has been loosely correlated with GSL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZIM jumps, then GSL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZIM
1D Price
Change %
ZIM100%
-3.83%
GSL - ZIM
54%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DAC - ZIM
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
CMRE - ZIM
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.80%
SB - ZIM
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
NMM - ZIM
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
More