Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSZCX vs NAESX
HSZCX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts HSZCX vs NAESX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.44
Change+$0.86 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
HSZCX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSZCX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSZCX is a StrongBuy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. HSZCX (5.43M). HSZCX pays higher dividends than NAESX: HSZCX (2.46) vs NAESX (1.20). HSZCX was incepted earlier than NAESX: HSZCX (26 years) vs NAESX (65 years). HSZCX (6.98) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). HSZCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). HSZCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: HSZCX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.62 vs. HSZCX (10.69). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 66.60 vs. HSZCX (25.62).
| HSZCX | NAESX | HSZCX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.50 | 0.17 | 1,471% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.98 | 0.17 | 4,106% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.686 | 6.494 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.43M | 161B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.46 | 1.20 | 205% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.69 | 13.62 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | -18.72 | 39.23 | -48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.62 | 66.60 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | -69.63 | 132.36 | -53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement