Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSUTX vs RGACX
HSUTX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts HSUTX vs RGACX
Rational Dynamic Brands Instl
Price$69.53
Change+$0.82 (+1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.97M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.62
Change+$0.46 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
HSUTX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSUTX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSUTX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. HSUTX (72M). RGACX pays higher dividends than HSUTX: RGACX (0.07) vs HSUTX (0.00). HSUTX was incepted earlier than RGACX: HSUTX (23 years) vs RGACX (23 years). HSUTX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). HSUTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUTX: RGACX (250) vs HSUTX (1000). HSUTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.35 vs. RGACX (21.05). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 42.51 vs. HSUTX (26.30).
| HSUTX | RGACX | HSUTX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.94 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.94 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.023 | 16.155 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 72M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.35 | 21.05 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.06 | 51.55 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.30 | 42.51 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | -62.99 | 97.10 | -65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement