Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSUCX vs RGEBX
HSUCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts HSUCX vs RGEBX
Rational Dynamic Brands C
Price$33.31
Change+$0.39 (+1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.32M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$79.23
Change+$0.77 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
HSUCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSUCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSUCX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. HSUCX (75.3M). HSUCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . HSUCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: HSUCX (12 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). HSUCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: RGEBX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). HSUCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.69 vs. RGEBX (10.04). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.69 vs. HSUCX (6.80).
| HSUCX | RGEBX | HSUCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 1.09 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 1.09 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.127 | 10.904 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.3M | 323B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.69 | 10.04 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.41 | 57.17 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.80 | 45.69 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | -82.83 | 78.56 | -105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement