Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSUCX vs RGEBX
HSUCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts HSUCX vs RGEBX
Rational Dynamic Brands C
Price$32.24
Change-$0.11 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.18M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$77.85
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
HSUCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSUCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSUCX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. HSUCX (63.2M). HSUCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . HSUCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: HSUCX (12 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). HSUCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: RGEBX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.59 vs. HSUCX (-0.86). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 16.94 vs. HSUCX (-1.10).
| HSUCX | RGEBX | HSUCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 1.08 | 199% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 1.08 | 199% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.248 | 1.552 | -16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 63.2M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.86 | 6.59 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.24 | 53.46 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.10 | 16.94 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.16 | 111.87 | -2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement