Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSUCX vs RGEBX
HSUCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts HSUCX vs RGEBX
Rational Dynamic Brands C
Price$33.48
Change+$0.09 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.31M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$80.73
Change+$0.27 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
HSUCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSUCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSUCX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. HSUCX (75.3M). HSUCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . HSUCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: HSUCX (12 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). HSUCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: RGEBX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). HSUCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.61 vs. RGEBX (16.90). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.14 vs. HSUCX (4.46).
| HSUCX | RGEBX | HSUCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 1.09 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 1.09 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.653 | 13.004 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.3M | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.61 | 16.90 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.70 | 55.95 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.46 | 45.14 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | -82.30 | 78.81 | -104% |